Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tongue River Road Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$86kReligion$79kHuman Services$53kInternational$49kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$1,300
Median grant
3
States reached
$468k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SHERIDAN$13,388
SHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$12,240
SAMARITANS PURSE$5,000
TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTE$2,500
THE HUB ON SMITH$1,500
WYOMING WOMEN IN AG$1,500
COOL SPRING COMMUNITY CHURCH$1,500
WYOMING CARES$1,500
MISC MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONS$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,250
DAYTON FIRE & RESCUE$1,250
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
BIG HORN EQUESTRIAN CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$600
CAMP BETHEL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kemmerer Senior Citizens Center: $100 → 8%Wyoming Cares: $4k → 11%Wyoming Cares: $3k → 11%Wyoming Cares: $3k → 11%Wyoming Cares: $3k → 11%Wyoming Cares: $2k → 11%WYOMING CARES: $2k → 11%Jasons Friends Foundation: $1k → 11%THE HUB ON SMITH: $2k → 10%Hub on Smith: $1k → 10%The Hub on Smith: $1k → 10%Hub on Smith: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$271k · 14 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$271k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
0%

Still filing today

43%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +106%
  • TR
    TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +36%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    4× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • JF
    JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • DW
    Drs Without Borders
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • FF
    Future Farmers of America - Gillett
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wyoming Foundation for Cancer Care Inc

To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.

Human Services
2
Central Wyoming Hospice & Transitions

To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.

—
3
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
4
Teton Valley Health Care Foundation

Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…

Health
5
Cheyenne County Community Center Foundation

Dedicated to serving the health, wellness, recreational, and social needs of cheyenne county and surrounding area

—
6
Wyoming Senior Citizens Inc

Wsci administers programs for senior citizens to promote their independence and self sufficiency.

Human Services
7
Serve Wyoming Inc

The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.

Philanthropy
8
Jackson Hole Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county

—
9
The Wyldlife Fund

To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.

Animals
10
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
11
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
12
Santa Claus Fund

To provide holiday gifts (new toys and clothes) for teton county, wyoming children whose economic and family situations qualify.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

First Presbyterian Church Sheridan: $62,255 · OtherFirst Presbyterian Church SheridanSheridan College Foundation: $61,850 · OtherSheridan College FoundationSheridan College: $24,480 · OtherSheridan CollegeLegacy Pregnancy Center: $6,300 · Other+18 more: $25,566 · Other+18 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $42,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSECAMP BETHEL INC: $15,500 · ReligionCAMP BETHEL INCTONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $23,650 · Community ImprovementTONGUE RI…Wyoming CARES Inc: $14,549 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $4,000 · Human ServicesJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesWORLD VISION INC: $6,250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalWRIGHT CENTENNIAL MUSEUM: $300 · Arts & CultureTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC: $100 · Health
Other$180,451Religion$57,500Community Improvement$23,650Human Services$19,649International$6,750Arts & Culture$300Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $42,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $23,650 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP BETHEL INC: $15,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWyoming CARES Inc: $14,549 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG HORN EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWRIGHT CENTENNIAL MUSEUM: $300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKemmerer Senior Citizens Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CAMP BETHEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Wyoming CARES Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds BIG HORN EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WRIGHT CENTENNIAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Kemmerer Senior Citizens Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott FoundationWY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tongue River Road Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tongue River Road Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tongue River Road Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tongue River Road Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tongue River Road’s filings →

    More from the funding graph