Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tones Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$584kYouth Development$257kInternational$252kArts & Culture$181kRecreation & Sports$37kEducation$32kHuman Services$15kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$2,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bethel Express of America$12,750
Upendo Children's Village Inc$12,550
Margaret Home$10,000
People on a Hill Inc$8,850
Individual grant recipient$5,650
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$5,400
Rochester Youth for Christ$4,000
Guitars for Glory$2,850
LifeTree Fellowship$2,800
Congregation Shema Yisrael$2,000
G-Force Ministries Inc$1,900
Bethel Christian Fellowship$1,650
Go Ministries$1,600
A-Praise Ministries$1,400
Individual grant recipient$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bethel Express of America: $28k → 14%BETHEL EXPRESS OF AMERICA: $24k → 14%Bethel Express of America: $19k → 14%Bethel Express of America: $14k → 14%Bethel Express of America: $13k → 14%BETHEL EXPRESS OF AMERICA: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 26 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
30

Total granted

$1.4M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

31%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BETHEL EXPRESS OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +41%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +100%
  • GF
    GUITARS FOR GLORY INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • OC
    OASIS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $31k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • HB
    Harvest Bible Chapel Rochester
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
2
Gospel Friendships Outreach Incorporated

Befriending, outreach, and preaching of Christianity

Religion
3
Boys2Men of God dba Children of the King Ministries
—
4
Gospel Crusade Ministries Inc
—
5
Global Encouragers Ministries Inc
Human Services
6
Follow Him Media Inc
Religion
7
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
8
Power Ministries International Inc
—
9
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
10
Camp Grace

Create faith-filled environment for chil

Youth Development
11
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
12
New Life Fellowship Global Ministries

The church provides the following program services : Weekly Bible Studies, Friday night prayer meetings, Weekly Sunday School, Weekly youth Meetings and weekly singles ministries

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth for Christ Usa Inc Rochester Youth for Christ Inc; the most unlike its peers is Guitars for Glory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEOPLEONAHILL INC: $158,732 · OtherPEOPLEONAHILL INCYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC ROCHESTER YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $146,594 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC ROCHESTER YOUTH FOR CHRIST INCLIFE TREE FELLOWSHIP: $134,642 · OtherLIFE TREE FELLOWSHIPBETHEL CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $104,735 · OtherBETHEL CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPIndividual grant recipient: $57,994 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHARLES G FINNEY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $32,425 · OtherOASIS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $31,000 · OtherGo Ministries: $29,000 · Other+40 more: $132,490 · Other+40 moreUpendo Children's Village Inc: $251,016 · Recreation & SportsUpendo Children's Vi…GUITARS FOR GLORY INC: $12,200 · Recreation & SportsG-FORCE Ministries Inc: $194,764 · ReligionG-FORCE Ministr…Friend of God Ministries Inc: $7,550 · ReligionBETHEL EXPRESS OF AMERICA INC: $109,532 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $36,617 · Youth DevelopmentFlower City Outreach Inc: $10,150 · Youth Development+1 more: $520 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MARGARET HOME INC: $10,500 · Housing & ShelterELEVATING CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $108 · International
Other$827,612Recreation & Sports$263,216Religion$202,314Human Services$109,532Youth Development$47,287Housing & Shelter$10,500International$608

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUpendo Children's Village Inc: $251,016 over 8y, 32% of budgetG-FORCE Ministries Inc: $194,764 over 8y, 56% of budgetYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC ROCHESTER YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $146,594 over 8y, 9.5% of budgetBETHEL EXPRESS OF AMERICA INC: $109,532 over 6y, 16% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $36,617 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGUITARS FOR GLORY INC: $12,200 over 4y, 11% of budgetTHE MARGARET HOME INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFlower City Outreach Inc: $10,150 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetFriend of God Ministries Inc: $7,550 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATING CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Upendo Children's Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds G-FORCE Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC ROCHESTER YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL EXPRESS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds GUITARS FOR GLORY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARGARET HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Flower City Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friend of God Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Esl Charitable FoundationNY15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Esl Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tones Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tones Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tones Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tones Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tones Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph