Skip to content
Tomorrow's Hope Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Tomorrow's Hope Foundation Inc

To ensure the excellence as well as the continuance of catholic schools on long island by increasing awareness and by providing scholarships and program funding for the needs of students and schools.

$111k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$7.0MReligion$25k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$111,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC SCHOOL OF LONG ISLAND$111,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC SCHOOL OF LONG ISLAND: $111k → 7%ST CHRISTOPHER SCHOOL: $62k → 6%ST CHRISTOPHER SCHOOL: $61k → 6%ST CHRISTOPHER SCHOOL: $50k → 6%ST MARTIN OF TOURS SCHOOL: $50k → 7%ST PATRICK SCHOOL: $178k → 7%ST PATRICK SCHOOL: $134k → 7%ST PATRICK SCHOOL: $131k → 7%ST PATRICK SCHOOL: $119k → 7%SS CYRIL AND METHODIUS SCHOOL: $58k → 7%SS CYRIL AND METHODIUS SCHOOL: $57k → 7%SS CYRIL AND METHODIUS SCHOOL: $57k → 7%ST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOL: $303k → 6%OUR LADY QUEEN OF APOSTLES REGIONAL SCHOOL: $56k → 7%ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE SCHOOL: $64k → 6%OUR LADY QUEEN OF APOSTLES REGIONAL SCHOOL: $55k → 7%OUR LADY QUEEN OF APOSTLES REGIONAL SCHOOL: $53k → 7%ST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOL: $157k → 6%ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE SCHOOL: $60k → 6%ST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOL: $150k → 6%ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE SCHOOL: $58k → 6%ST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOL: $133k → 6%ST MARY SCHOOL: $79k → 7%ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE SCHOOL: $53k → 6%ST MARY SCHOOL: $72k → 7%HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL: $62k → 6%HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL: $55k → 6%ST MARY SCHOOL: $58k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE HAMPTONS REGIONAL SCHOOL: $111k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE HAMPTONS REGIONAL SCHOOL: $69k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE HAMPTONS REGIONAL SCHOOL: $63k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE HAMPTONS REGIONAL SCHOOL: $53k → 7%ST PATRICK SCHOOL: $66k → 7%OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $103k → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $57k → 6%ST JOHN PAUL II REGIONAL SCHOOL: $62k → 7%OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $98k → 7%OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $98k → 7%OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $64k → 7%HOLY NAME OF MARY SCHOOL: $61k → 6%HOLY NAME OF MARY SCHOOL: $57k → 6%HOLY NAME OF MARY SCHOOL: $51k → 6%ALL SAINTS REGIONAL SCHOOL: $56k → 6%ST BRIGIDOUR LADY OF HOPE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $85k → 6%ST BRIGIDOUR LADY OF HOPE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $61k → 6%ST BRIGIDOUR LADY OF HOPE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $60k → 6%ST BRIGIDOUR LADY OF HOPE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $57k → 6%ST DOMINIC SCHOOL: $103k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 40 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 40 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
5

Total granted

$6.8M
$60k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PATRICK SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $823k
  • SM
    ST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $743k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE REGIONAL SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $363k

Funded once

  • SI
    ST ISIDORE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • SO
    SISTERS OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS AT OLD WESTBURY NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF MERCY REGIONAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2022.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2022, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PATRICK SCHOOL: $822,976 · OtherST PATRICK SCHOOLST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOL: $743,364 · OtherST MARTIN DE PORRES MARIANIST SCHOOLOUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $363,389 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE HAMPTONS REGIONAL SCHOOL: $295,525 · OtherST BRIGIDOUR LADY OF HOPE REGIONAL SCHOOL: $262,200 · OtherST MARY SCHOOL: $257,805 · OtherST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $244,525 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE SCHOOL: $233,850 · Other+38 more: $3,783,053 · Other+38 more
Other$7,006,687

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tomorrows Hope Founda…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Tomorrows Hope Foundation II IncNY24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tomorrows Hope Foundation II Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tomorrow's Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home