Skip to content

· Public charity

Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation

Direct support of California Institute of Technology, Harvey Mudd College, Loma Linda University, Loyola Marymount University,Mount St.

$366k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.0MScience & Tech$401k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$43,554
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CA Inst of Technology$61,122
Loma Linda University$43,554
Pomona College$43,554
Harvey Mudd College$43,554
Loyola Marymount Univ$43,554
University of Redlands$43,554
Mount Saint Mary's$43,554
Occidental College$43,554
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Loma Linda University: $44k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $61k → 14%University of Redlands: $44k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $59k → 14%Loma Linda University: $42k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $55k → 14%University of Redlands: $42k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $50k → 14%Loma Linda University: $39k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $49k → 14%University of Redlands: $39k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%Loma Linda University: $36k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%University of Redlands: $36k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%Loma Linda University: $35k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%University of Redlands: $35k → 14%Occidental College: $44k → 14%Loma Linda University: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $42k → 14%University of Redlands: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $39k → 14%Loma Linda University: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $36k → 14%University of Redlands: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $35k → 14%Pomona College: $44k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $44k → 14%Pomona College: $42k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $42k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $39k → 14%Pomona College: $39k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $36k → 14%Pomona College: $36k → 14%Pomona College: $35k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $35k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $44k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $42k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $39k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $36k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $35k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $44k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $42k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $39k → 14%Mount Saint Marys: $36k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $35k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $462k · revenue +14%
  • HM
    Harvey Mudd College
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +49%
  • POMONA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +90%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    California Lutheran University

    The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

    Education
    2
    University of Southern California

    The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

    Education
    3
    University of Miami

    See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

    Education
    4
    Lewis & Clark College

    Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

    Education
    5
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    6
    The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

    The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

    Education
    7
    St Mary's University

    St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

    —
    8
    St Marys University of Minnesota

    Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

    Education
    9
    The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

    Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

    Education
    10
    The Catholic University of America

    As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

    Education
    11
    Hillsdale College

    Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

    Education
    12
    Molloy University

    Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyola Marymount University; the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $461,872 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYHarvey Mudd College: $329,854 · EducationHarvey Mudd CollegeLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $329,854 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITYPOMONA COLLEGE: $329,854 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGELOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $329,854 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $329,854 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDSOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $329,854 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEGEMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $329,854 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY
    Education$2,770,850

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $461,872 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $329,854 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $329,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $329,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $329,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $329,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $329,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $329,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
    • Who funds Harvey Mudd College ↗
    • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
    • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Tom and Valley Knudsen’s filings →

      More from the funding graph