Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation

Direct support of California Institute of Technology, Harvey Mudd College, Loma Linda University, Loyola Marymount University,Mount St.

$355k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.0MScience & Tech$401k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $296k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
$42,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CA Inst of Technology$59,350
University of Redlands$42,300
Pomona College$42,300
Loma Linda University$42,300
Occidental College$42,300
Harvey Mudd College$42,300
Mount Saint Mary's$42,300
Loyola Marymount Univ$42,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Loma Linda University: $42k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $59k → 14%University of Redlands: $42k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $55k → 14%Loma Linda University: $39k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $50k → 14%University of Redlands: $39k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $49k → 14%Loma Linda University: $36k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%University of Redlands: $36k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%Loma Linda University: $35k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%University of Redlands: $35k → 14%CA Inst of Technology: $47k → 14%Loma Linda University: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $42k → 14%University of Redlands: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $39k → 14%Loma Linda University: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $36k → 14%University of Redlands: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $35k → 14%Loma Linda University: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $34k → 14%University of Redlands: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $34k → 14%Loma Linda University: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $34k → 14%University of Redlands: $34k → 14%Occidental College: $34k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $42k → 14%Pomona College: $42k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $39k → 14%Pomona College: $39k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $36k → 14%Pomona College: $36k → 14%Harvey Mudd College: $35k → 14%Pomona College: $35k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $42k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $39k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $36k → 14%Loyola Marymount Univ: $35k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $42k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $39k → 14%Mount Saint Marys: $36k → 14%Mount Saint Mary's: $35k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$2.1M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $401k · revenue +35%
  • HM
    Harvey Mudd College
    8× · 2017–2024 · $286k · revenue +49%
  • POMONA COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $286k · revenue +90%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    California Lutheran University

    The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

    Education
    2
    University of Southern California

    The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

    Education
    3
    University of Miami

    See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

    Education
    4
    Lewis & Clark College

    Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

    Education
    5
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    6
    The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

    The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

    Education
    7
    St Marys University of Minnesota

    Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

    Education
    8
    Hillsdale College

    Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

    Education
    9
    The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

    Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

    Education
    10
    St Mary's University

    St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

    11
    The Catholic University of America

    As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

    Education
    12
    Molloy University

    Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyola Marymount University and the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $400,750 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYHarvey Mudd College — $286,300 · EducationHarvey Mudd CollegeLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $286,300 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITYPOMONA COLLEGE — $286,300 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGELOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $286,300 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS — $286,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDSOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE — $286,300 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEGEMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $286,300 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY
    Education$2,404,850

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $400,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College — $286,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $286,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE — $286,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $286,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS — $286,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE — $286,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $286,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    • Who funds Harvey Mudd College
    • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE
    • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS
    • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE
    • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Tom and Valley Knudsen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph