Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom and Sherri Boyce Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$121kHealth$23kEducation$16kCommunity Improvement$13kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $52k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LISA BAIN MINISTRIES TULSA$11,000
TULSA BOYS HOME$10,625
EASTERN OKLAHOMA CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,150
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,500
ELLISON ACADEMY$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,650
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,500
FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES$1,700
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$1,500
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$1,500
MATHIS BROTHERS PARTNERING WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES$1,340
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%TULSA BOYS HOME: $11k → 15%HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA: $2k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $8k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $2k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $2k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $515 → 15%FOSTERING HOPE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 9 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$181k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LB
    LISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $29k · revenue +19%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +59%
  • FC
    Family & Childrens Services Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • BA
    Broken Arrow Chamber of Commerce
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • TP
    THE PROVISION GROUP DBA CHRISTMAS WONDERLAND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
3
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
4
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
5
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
7
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
8
LifePath Hospice Inc

Lifepath Hospice, Inc. provides hospice services that relieve the suffering of persons residing in its communities affected by life-limiting illnesses and end-of-life issues so all may live as fully and comfortably as possible.

Health
9
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
12
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Broken Arrow Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEASTERN OKLAHOMA CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $35,500 · OtherEASTERN OKLAHOMA CATHOLIC CHARITIESBroken Arrow Chamber of Commerce: $12,525 · OtherBroken Arrow Chamber of CommerceIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE PROVISION GROUP DBA CHRISTMAS WONDERLAND: $10,000 · OtherTHE PROVISION GROUP DBA CHRISTMAS WONDERLANDMATHIS BROTHERS PARTNERING WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $5,176 · Other+6 more: $19,150 · Other+6 moreFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $11,715 · Human ServicesFamily & Childr…TULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $10,625 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOM…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR…FOSTERING HOPE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPE …PHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPHILOS HOSPITAL…LISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC: $29,000 · ReligionLISA BAIN MIN…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $14,500 · HealthST JUDE CH…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $8,120 · HealthSHRINERS H…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,500 · EducationGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$152,351Human Services$33,340Religion$29,000Health$22,620Education$10,500Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC: $29,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBroken Arrow Chamber of Commerce: $12,525 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $11,715 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $8,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Broken Arrow Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILOS HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arvest FoundationAR13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom and Sherri Boyce Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom and Sherri Boyce Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom and Sherri Boyce Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph