Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom and Marion Braum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$26kInternational$10kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$4kEducation$3kHealth$2kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ST ANTHONY 'S PARISH$1,300
BPOE$1,000
THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE$1,000
DOCTORS TO THE WORLD$1,000
ALASKA RADIO MISSION - KNOM$750
SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$750
THE SHACK$500
SUMMIT IN HONDURAS$500
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$300
MASS TIMES TRUST$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 3%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MARRIAGE MISSIONARIES: $300 → 3%MARRIAGE MISSIONARIES: $300 → 3%MARRIAGE MISSIONARIES: $300 → 3%MARRIAGE MISSIONARIES: $250 → 3%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ND
MI
WY
SD
PA
CA
CO
AZ
NM
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 25 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
10

Total granted

$75k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+5%

Still filing today

24%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DOCTORS TO THE WORLD
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +224%
  • BP
    BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE USA
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1k · revenue +33%
  • SI
    SUMMIT IN HONDURAS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • AN
    ASHEVILLE NC ELKS LODGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • SJ
    Saint John Institute
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Explore God Network
—
2
Instituto De Estudios Teologicos

Conference

Education
3
Dove On the Rise International

Expansion of the Gospel of Christ through training literature and digital teaching materials.

—
4
Global Dmm
Religion
5
Burning Hearts Disciples

Consulting for Catholic organizations

Religion
6
Divine Revelation Ministry
Religion
7
Fr Joseph K Bill Ministries Inc

To the advancement of Religion and Religious teachings and beliefs in the Roman Catholic faith to create a healing environment through retreats evangelism and educational training

—
8
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
9
Imago Dei Ministries
—
10
Ministerio Yo Soy La Puerta

Religious

Religion
11
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
12
Relevant Resources

To spread the gospel through public speaking platforms and engagements

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judi's House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Doctors to the World. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $11,700 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTSDOCTORS TO THE WORLD: $9,800 · OtherDOCTORS TO THE WORLDIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALASKA RADIO MISSION - KNOM: $4,300 · OtherALASKA RADIO MISSION - KNOMSISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION: $4,250 · OtherSISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTIONST ANTHONY 'S PARISH: $4,200 · OtherST ANTHONY 'S PARISHSERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $4,150 · OtherSERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCOUR LORD OF CZESTOCHOWA RC CHURCH: $3,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherFIRST PEOPLE FUND: $2,900 · OtherST JOHN INSTITUTE: $2,750 · Other+20 more: $19,100 · Other+20 moreTHE SHACK: $1,850 · ReligionTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $1,000 · ReligionSUMMIT IN HONDURAS INC: $1,250 · InternationalMARRIAGE MISSIONARIES: $1,150 · Human ServicesJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $1,150 · PhilanthropySaint John Institute: $1,000 · EducationREAL PRESENCE RADIO: $300 · Arts & Culture
Other$74,900Religion$2,850International$1,250Human Services$1,150Philanthropy$1,150Education$1,000Arts & Culture$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOCTORS TO THE WORLD: $9,800 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $2,200 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHACK: $1,850 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE USA: $1,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMIT IN HONDURAS INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARRIAGE MISSIONARIES: $1,150 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSaint John Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Resource Center in Durango: $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREAL PRESENCE RADIO: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOCTORS TO THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHACK ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE USA ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT IN HONDURAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARRIAGE MISSIONARIES ↗
  • Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Saint John Institute ↗
  • Who funds Womens Resource Center in Durango ↗
  • Who funds REAL PRESENCE RADIO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom and Marion Braum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom and Marion Braum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom and Marion Braum Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom and Marion Braum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom and Marion Braum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph