· Private foundation
Tm & Na O'Donnell Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST IGNATIUS | $20,000 |
| MAGNIFICAT | $20,000 |
| LENSC | $10,000 |
| LOVE A STRAY | $10,000 |
| MAKE A WISH | $10,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MHMALACHI HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +106%
- GCGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +10%
- BIBLUECOATS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- HLHOPES LANDINGone grant, 2023 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.
Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.
Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.
Cats strives to grow as an organization committed to our mission to deliver highly professional, state of the art chemical dependency and behavioral health services to the under-served and under-represented. cats will be known for…
The mission of the collaborative is to lead, empower and connect our community to eradicate human trafficking.
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve.
To enroll low-income, uninsured women in central and south texas in a no-cost program to pay all charges related to breast cancer treatment and lifetime follow-up care.
Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…
The mission of women's center & shelter of greater pittsburgh is to strengthen our ability to meet the individual and evolving needs of those affected by domestic violence by investing in the growth of our people, deepening community…
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
How this is measured
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOVE-A-STRAY ↗
- Who funds MALACHI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BLUECOATS INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S MISSION ↗
- Who funds Girls With Sole ↗
- Who funds HOPES LANDING ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAIRS ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Tm & Na O'Donnell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tm & Na O'Donnell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tm & Na O'Donnell Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tm & Na O'Donnell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Tm & Na O'Donnell’s filings →