Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tj Whalen Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$103kEnvironment$25kInternational$20kHealth$16kFood & Nutrition$7kHuman Services$6kCivil Rights$5kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RSDSA SUPPORTING CRPS COMMUNITY$30,000
NAVAJO WATER PROJECT$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION$2,500
LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
SAVE THE CHILDREN$2,500
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY$2,500
FOODSHARE FEEDING AMERICA$2,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $3k → 9%RSDSA SUPPORTING CRPS COMMUNITY: $55k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 9%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $4k → 17%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $2k → 9%RSDSA SUPPORTING CRPS COMMUNITY: $30k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 9%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%NAVAJO WATER PROJECT: $5k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $4k → 17%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $2k → 9%RSDSA - SUPPORTING CRPS COMMUNITY: $5k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 9%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%NAVAJO WATER PROJECT: $5k → 14%ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%FOODSHARE FEEDING AMERICA: $3k → 12%PBS (PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE): $2k → 7%NAVAJO WATER PROJECT: $4k → 14%ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%FOODSHARE FEEDING AMERICA: $3k → 12%FOODSHARE FEEDING AMERICA: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CA
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$172k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+76%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +13%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +29%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • HT
    HIKE THE GOOD HIKE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • PB
    PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hike the Good Hike. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RSDSA SUPPORTING CRPS COMMUNITY: $90,000 · OtherRSDSA SUPPORTING CRPS COMMUNITYNAVAJO WATER PROJECT: $13,500 · OtherNAVAJO WATER PROJECTLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · OtherLOYOLA UNIVERSITYFOODSHARE FEEDING AMERICA: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $6,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,500 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherLOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…Save The Children Federation Inc: $6,500 · InternationalSave The Chi…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthST JUDE C…ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 · HealthALZHEIMER…HIKE THE GOOD HIKE: $3,200 · HealthHIKE THE …PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$145,000International$19,500Health$15,700Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HIKE THE GOOD HIKE ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tj Whalen Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tj Whalen Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tj Whalen Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph