· Private foundation
Time Warner Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $278k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA PLAZA DE CULTURA Y ARTES | $78,358 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $50,000 |
| SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY | $50,000 |
| HISPANIC FEDERATION | $50,000 |
| NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL | $50,000 |
| HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $28,940 |
| CONNECTICUT PLAYERS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Time Warner Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 36 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL3× · 2017–2021 · $800k · revenue +33%
Sundance Institute2× · 2017–2018 · $753k · revenue +1%- TSTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $500k · revenue +159%
Funded once
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +99%- BABROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INCone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue 0%
- BCBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INCone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…
Mtc's work includes producing and developing new work on and off-broadway, nurturing artists throughout their careers, and positively impacting the lives of many through innovative education programs. we are committed to equity, diversity…
The mission of theatre for a new audience is to develop and vitalize the performance and study of shakespeare and classic drama. the theatre is dedicated to the language and ideas of writers - to a dialogue over centuries between…
Develop recognition of international theater
The latino theater company operates the los angeles theatre center, whose mission is to provide a world class arts center for those pursuing artistic excellence; a laboratory where both tradition and innovation are honored and honed; a…
Producing and developing plays and musicals.
The new group is an artist-driven company with a commitment to developing and producing powerful, contemporary theater. while constantly evolving, we maintain an ensemble approach to all our work and an articulated style of emotional…
Studio Theatre produces exceptional contemporary theatre in deliberately intimate spaces, fostering a more thoughtful, more empathetic, and more connected community, in Washington DC and beyond.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harlem Stage Inc and the most unlike its peers is Point Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
- Who funds THE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds TRIBECA FILM INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New DramatistsInc ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE GHETTO FILM SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds REEL STORIES TEEN FILMMAKING INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds BERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds HARLEM STAGE INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CHICKEN & EGG FILMS INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK FILMMAKER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
- Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS INC ↗
- Who funds MA-YI FILIPINO THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC DBA MA-YI THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA DE CULTURA Y ARTES ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds BORSCHT CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Lucille Lortel Foundation Inc · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Alliance of Resident Theatres New York Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Hearst Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Time Warner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Connecticut Players Foundation Inc D/B/a Long Wharf Theatre — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.