Skip to content
Thrive in Southern New Mexico at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Thrive in Southern New Mexico

To advance the common good, create lasting change and enrich lives by harnessing the collective compassion and resources of our community to improve lives.

$376k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$603kYouth Development$306kReligion$242kHealth$86kCrime & Legal$51kHousing & Shelter$41kInternational$10kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $213,675, the rows itemized in this filing. The $376,396 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $162,721 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $166k
$13,447
Median grant
1
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COPE$37,104
FLICKINGER CENTER$22,797
DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION$19,568
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$17,827
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH$16,763
SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER$14,180
GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$14,080
ALAMOGORDO SENIOR CENTER$13,447
WORLD RELIEF$10,000
SERVICEHEART CASA$9,678
NM CENTER FOR NURSING EXCEL$9,607
ZIA THERAPY$8,127
SANE$7,224
THE COUNSELING CENTER$7,148
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO$6,125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%COPE: $38k → 20%COPE: $37k → 20%COPE: $27k → 20%COPE: $25k → 20%COPE: $24k → 20%COPE: $22k → 20%COPE: $19k → 20%COPE: $19k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $11k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 20%SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 20%CHINS: $27k → 20%ZIA THERAPY: $11k → 20%ZIA THERAPY: $8k → 20%ZIA THERAPY: $8k → 20%ZIA THERAPY: $8k → 20%ZIA THERAPY: $6k → 20%ZIA THERAPY: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+88%

Still filing today

28%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +94%
  • SM
    SACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +63%
  • ZT
    ZIA THERAPY CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue +88%
  • FC
    FLICKINGER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Counseling Center & Play Therapy Institute of New Mexico

Our mission is to provide a healing center for child trauma. and to practice informed mental health services for chldren and families and to provide training and supervision for other family mental health care professionals in new mexico.

Human Services
2
Therapeutic Living Services Inc

To provide housing and independent living programs to those recovering from mental illness.

Human Services
3
The Children's Center of Southwest

Provide safe place for various agencies to meet with and interview abused children.

Crime & Legal
4
The Rehabilitation Center

Provides occupational, physical, and speech therapies.

—
5
Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web

The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…

Health
6
Children's Center

Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.

—
7
The Childrens Centerinc

Provide safety, housing and mentoring for abandoned, abused, neglected and exeloited children, adolescents and families.

—
8
Children's Services Inc

Provide shelter for children and sponsors family day care program for children and qualifying adults.

—
9
Center for Community Services

The center for community services empowers families to break the cycle of poverty through crisis assistance and employment readiness.

Human Services
10
Center for Children Inc

The center for children is dedicated to the prevention and treatment of child abuse and the promotion of positive mental and behavioral health through crisis intervention, therapy, and education.

—
11
Child & Family Services of Yuma Inc

Child & Family Services provides a wide continuum of outpatient services for children and thier families with behavioral/mental health needs, in aspiration of fulfilling the family's individualized goals. Right Turn provides transitional…

Human Services
12
The Children's Center

To meet the needs of the community by providing quality child care that encourages individual development in a safe, nuturing environment

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children in Need of Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dolly Partons Imagination Library of Otero County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS: $231,214 · OtherVARIOUSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO: $129,079 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTEROBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $122,045 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSCity of Alamogordo: $118,205 · OtherCity of AlamogordoFLICKINGER CENTER: $84,810 · OtherFLICKINGER CENTERSERVICEHEART CASA: $64,816 · OtherSERVICEHEART CASASANE: $63,141 · OtherSANEKIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY: $50,736 · OtherWHITE SANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $40,830 · Other+12 more: $183,645 · Other+12 moreCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC: $211,987 · Human ServicesCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVI…SACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES: $81,631 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENI…ZIA THERAPY CENTER INC: $46,933 · Human ServicesZIA THERAPY CENTER INCCHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC: $27,365 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVI…DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF OTERO COUNTY: $184,077 · ReligionDOLLY PARTON…THE COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,148 · Health
Other$1,088,521Human Services$367,916Religion$184,077Health$7,148

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC: $211,987 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES: $81,631 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetZIA THERAPY CENTER INC: $46,933 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWHITE SANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $40,830 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetCHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC: $27,365 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,148 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ZIA THERAPY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE SANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thrive in Southern New Mexico funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thrive in Southern New Mexico. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thrive in Southern New Mexico?

    Find your warmest path to Thrive in Southern New Mexico through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thrive in Southern New Mexico’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home