· Public charity
Thrive in Southern New Mexico
To advance the common good, create lasting change and enrich lives by harnessing the collective compassion and resources of our community to improve lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $213,675 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $376,396 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $162,721 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $166k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COPE | $37,104 |
| FLICKINGER CENTER | $22,797 |
| DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION | $19,568 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $17,827 |
| CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH | $16,763 |
| SACRAMENTO SENIOR CENTER | $14,180 |
| GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $14,080 |
| ALAMOGORDO SENIOR CENTER | $13,447 |
| WORLD RELIEF | $10,000 |
| SERVICEHEART CASA | $9,678 |
| NM CENTER FOR NURSING EXCEL | $9,607 |
| ZIA THERAPY | $8,127 |
| SANE | $7,224 |
| THE COUNSELING CENTER | $7,148 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO | $6,125 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC8× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +94%
- SMSACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES7× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +63%
- ZTZIA THERAPY CENTER INC6× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- CICHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue +88%
- FCFLICKINGER CENTERone grant, 2023 · $14k
- COCHURCH OF THE EPIPHANYone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to provide a healing center for child trauma. and to practice informed mental health services for chldren and families and to provide training and supervision for other family mental health care professionals in new mexico.
To provide housing and independent living programs to those recovering from mental illness.
Provide safe place for various agencies to meet with and interview abused children.
Provides occupational, physical, and speech therapies.
The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…
The center for community services empowers families to break the cycle of poverty through crisis assistance and employment readiness.
Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.
Provide safety, housing and mentoring for abandoned, abused, neglected and exeloited children, adolescents and families.
To meet the needs of the community by providing quality child care that encourages individual development in a safe, nuturing environment
Provide shelter for children and sponsors family day care program for children and qualifying adults.
Child & Family Services provides a wide continuum of outpatient services for children and thier families with behavioral/mental health needs, in aspiration of fulfilling the family's individualized goals. Right Turn provides transitional…
To provide services for developmentally disabled individuals and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children in Need of Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dolly Partons Imagination Library of Otero County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ZIA THERAPY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE SANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thrive in Southern New Mexico funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Thrive in Southern New Mexico?
Find your warmest path to Thrive in Southern New Mexico through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.