Skip to content

· Private foundation

Three Canopies Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$12kFood & Nutrition$9kCivil Rights$4kHealth$75
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DuPage PADS$1,550
Peoples Resource Center$1,550
Loaves Fishes Community Services$1,250
Bridge Communities$1,050
Lazarus House$1,000
Hesed House$500
Midwest Shelter for Homeless Vets$400
West Suburban Community Pantry$250
Misercordia$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Lazarus House: $1k → 8%Lazarus House: $800 → 8%Lazarus House: $800 → 8%Lazarus House: $400 → 8%Lazarus House: $400 → 8%Hesed House: $500 → 8%Hesed House: $500 → 8%Hesed House: $500 → 8%Midwest Shelter for Homeless Vets: $400 → 7%Hesed House: $500 → 8%Midwest Shelter for Homeless Vets: $350 → 7%Hesed House: $400 → 8%Midwest Shelter for Homeless Vets: $250 → 7%Midwest Shelter for Homeless Veterans: $150 → 7%Loaves Fishes Community Services: $1k → 7%Loaves Fishes Community Services: $1k → 7%Loaves Fishes Community Services: $1k → 7%Loaves Fishes Community Services: $1k → 7%Loaves Fishes Community Services: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 8 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$24k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+12%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DUPAGE PADS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +31%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +124%
  • PR
    PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $700 · revenue -8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOUSING ADVOCACY AND DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
3
Welcome House Inc

Welcome house provides a continuum of services to end homelessness and promote stability for each person we serve.

Housing & Shelter
4
Respond Now

Respond now connects those in need with health, hunger, and housing services in the chicago southland.

Human Services
5
Five Loaves & Two Fish Food Pantry

The organization operates a food bank which provides food for at risk households.

Human Services
6
Community Action House

Community action house provides area families and individuals with food, clothing, shelter, and opportunities to build the necessary skills to achieve a stable and prosperous life.

—
7
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
8
Cooperative Downtown Ministries Inc

The mission is to provide to the homeless, ages 18 and older, in the birmingham area a nurturing and caring environment offering supportive services that break the cycle of homelessness and empower individuals to achieve their highest…

—
9
Central Iowa Shelter & Services

The organization endeavors to provide safe emergency and transitional shelter and meals to homeless adults along with resource assistance to move clients beyond homelessness and toward independent living.

Housing & Shelter
10
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
11
Community Pantry

Provide emergency food, housing and utilities for people in need in the community

Human Services
12
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public Action to Deliver Shelter Inc D/B/a Hesed House; the most unlike its peers is Community Housing Advocacy and Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,750 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICESLAZARUS HOUSE: $3,400 · Human ServicesLAZARUS HOUSEPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $2,400 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOU…MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $1,150 · Human ServicesMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INCDUPAGE PADS INC: $5,650 · Housing & ShelterDUPAGE PADS INCBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $1,900 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3,750 · OtherPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENT…WEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $1,050 · OtherWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNIT…Individual grant recipient: $200 · Other+1 more: $75 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $700 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$11,700Housing & Shelter$7,650Other$5,075Food & Nutrition$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $5,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE: $3,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING ADVOCACY AND DEVELOPMENT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Three Canopies Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Three Canopies Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Three Canopies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph