Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.6MReligion$354kHuman Services$128kEnvironment$58kHealth$47kPhilanthropy$39kArts & Culture$20kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $76k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL GREEN$19,748
PRECIOUS BLOOD CATHOLIC CHURCH$18,964
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$14,000
DUBOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$13,100
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
DUBOIS COUNTY MUSEUM$6,000
RESCUE MISSION$4,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC CHURCH$4,000
HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST MEINRAD ARCHABBEY$2,000
LOST RIVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$1,500
JUNIOR ACHEIVEMENT$1,000
ROJAC$1,000
VUJC FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OZANAM FAMILY SHELTER: $5k → 15%TRI COUNTY YMCA: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 31 repeat orgs$867k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
22

Total granted

$1.5M
$855k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

35%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $47k · revenue +83%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +65%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • GE
    GJCS EDUCATIONAL TRUST
    one grant, 2017 · $445k
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE
    one grant, 2017 · $113k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $105k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Guardianship Services

At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…

Human Services
2
Habitat for Humanity of Dubois County Inc

Simple decent housing for people in need

—
3
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Foundation Inc

To support the charitable, educational and other exempt purposes of the indiana united methodist children's home, inc.

Philanthropy
4
Northern Indiana Historical Society Foundation

To solicit, receive, invest, and hold endowment contributions and donations for northern indiana historical society, inc. and to make distributions to the society.

Arts & Culture
5
Visit Dubois County Inc

To promote conventions and tourism in Dubois County, Indiana

Community Improvement
6
Indiana County Humane Society

To provide and to promote humane treatment toward animals

Animals
7
Housing Opportunities Inc

Housing Opportunities DBA CoAction works to resolve and prevent homelessness in our communities by providing emergency housing, permanent supportive housing, affordable rentals, rental assistance, housing counseling, street outreach…

—
8
Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals
9
The Jackson County United Way Inc

Jackson county united way assesses needs, secures resources and strategically invests those resources to create lasting, measurable change in the areas of education, health and financial stability for all people in jackson county.

Philanthropy
10
Indiana Masonic Home Inc

To serve the charitable purpose of operating the continuing care retirement community known as the indiana masonic home in franklin, indiana.

Housing & Shelter
11
Spay Neuter Services of Indiana

Pet friendly services of indiana saves animal lives and prevents suffering. we provide free and low-cost spay/neuter surgery certificates to animal shelters, rescue groups and limited-income families. our lifesaving services address the…

Animals
12
Indiana Historical Society

Since 1831, the indiana historical society has been indiana's storyteller, connecting people to the past by collecting, preserving, interpreting, and disseminating the state's history. a nonprofit membership organization, the ihs also…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buffalo Trace Council Inc Boy Scouts of America #156; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS: $704,000 · OtherGREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLSGJCS EDUCATIONAL TRUST: $444,605 · OtherGJCS EDUCATIONAL TRUSTNE DUBOIS SCHOOL CORPORATION: $357,546 · OtherNE DUBOIS SCHOOL CORPORATIONCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE: $112,712 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CHURCH: $105,000 · OtherGREATER JASPER CONSOL SCHOOL: $80,000 · Other+46 more: $325,367 · Other+46 moreTri-County Young Mens Christian Association: $100,000 · Human ServicesOzanam Family Shelter Corp: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $47,000 · HealthDubois County Museum Inc: $12,250 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE ARTS INC: $1,350 · Arts & CultureNEXT ACT INC: $1,350 · Arts & CultureIndiana University Foundation: $8,780 · EducationLITTLE SPRUCE NATURE SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsDUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,129,230Human Services$105,500Health$47,000Arts & Culture$14,950Education$13,780Animals$5,250Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTri-County Young Mens Christian Association: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $47,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDubois County Museum Inc: $12,250 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $8,780 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOzanam Family Shelter Corp: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SPRUCE NATURE SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156: $2,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJunior Achievement of SW Indiana Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA: $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP: $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CONNECTION INC: $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ARTS INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNEXT ACT INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC MAPLE GROVE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNext Step Recovery Home Inc: $500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tri-County Young Mens Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dubois County Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Ozanam Family Shelter Corp ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SPRUCE NATURE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156 ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of SW Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dubois County Community FoundationIN36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dubois County Community Foundation · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Herb Thyen Family Foundation · The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Ruxer Foundation Inc · Jjc Charitable Trust · Thomas L Habig Foundation Inc · C A Stenftenagel Family Foundation · Sanda Hills Equine Center Inc · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co · United Cabinet Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph