Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas S Carter Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$556k
Granted FY2019
10
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$294kEducation$130kArts & Culture$125kHuman Services$11kHealth$616International$385Housing & Shelter$212Civil Rights$145Other$0
02FY2019 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $466k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morgan Arts Council$125,334
Hope Lutheran Church$125,313
First United Methodist$82,657
Calvary Baptist Church$82,657
Thomas Jefferson High School Alum Assn$50,000
Coachella Valley Alumnae Panhellenic$30,000
University of Texas at Tyler$30,000
All Saints Episcopal School$10,000
Southern Methodist University$10,000
Eastern Panhandle United Way$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $422) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $70 → 14%Blinded Veterans Assoc: $70 → 9%Covenant House: $177 → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $35 → 14%Blinded Veterans Assoc: $35 → 9%Covenant House: $35 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
SD
CA
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

3%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 15 repeat orgs$547k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2019, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
31

Total granted

$15k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

47%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $546k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesReligionEducationInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    2× · 2017–2018 · $245 · revenue +19%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $212 · revenue +34%
  • Mercy Ships International
    2× · 2017–2018 · $140 · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • LS
    LONE STAR CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $105 · revenue +27%
  • NP
    National Pro Life All
    one grant, 2018 · $85
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $70
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal
5
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
9
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
10
National Cable Satellite Corporation

Provide the public access to the live gavel-to-gavel proceedings of both houses of the us congress, and other forums where public policy is discussed, debated, and decided - all without editing, commentary or analysis and with a balanced…

Arts & Culture
11
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
12
American Mensa Ltd

To identify and foster human intelligence for the benefit of humanity; to encourage research in the nature, characteristics, and uses of intelligence; and to provide a stimulating intellectual and social environment for its members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN ARTS COUNCIL INC: $125,334 · OtherMORGAN ARTS COUNCIL INCHope Lutheran Church: $125,313 · OtherHope Lutheran ChurchCalvary Baptist Church: $82,657 · OtherCalvary Baptist ChurchFirst United Methodist: $82,657 · OtherFirst United MethodistThomas Jefferson High School Alum Assn: $50,000 · OtherThomas Jefferson High School Alum AssnUniversity of Texas at Tyler: $30,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas at TylerCoachella Valley Alumnae Panhellenic: $30,000 · OtherCoachella Valley Alumnae Panhellenic+36 more: $24,675 · OtherSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $70 · EducationCOVENANT HOUSE: $212 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105 · Human ServicesBLINDED VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $105 · Human ServicesMercy Corps: $245 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $140 · InternationalMAYO CLINIC: $71 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $70 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $35 · HealthCongressional Prayer Caucus Foundation: $70 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $30 · ReligionThe Presidential Prayer Team: $25 · ReligionNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $105 · Environment
Other$550,636Education$10,070Human Services$422International$385Health$176Religion$125Environment$105

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORGAN ARTS COUNCIL INC: $125,334 over 1y, 60% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $245 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $140 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLINDED VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $71 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCongressional Prayer Caucus Foundation: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY COMMISSION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Presidential Prayer Team: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORGAN ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLINDED VETERANS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas S Carter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas S Carter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas S Carter’s filings →

More from the funding graph