Skip to content

· Public charity

Thomas Health System Inc

Thomas Health System, Inc.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$131kEducation$47kRecreation & Sports$32kCommunity Improvement$17kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $127,103, the rows itemized in this filing. The $137,952 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,849 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Foundation for Thomas Memorial Hospital$53,603
Charleston Professional Baseball Co LLC$21,500
WVU Foundation$15,000
YMCA of Kanawha Valley$10,000
American Heart Association$10,000
WV Symphony Orchestra$10,000
Charleston Area Alliance$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%YMCA of Kanawha Valley: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$161k · 4 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$161k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+90%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA
    3× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +277%
  • FM
    FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • WV
    West Virginia University Hospitals Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia State Medical Association

The west virginia state medical association is organized for the purpose of providing services to its members, who are all either physicians practicing in the state of west virginia or medical students. specifically, the association serves…

—
2
West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by serving as its faculty practice plan and providing a full range of business management services to its…

Health
3
Wetzel County Hospital Inc

Wetzel County Hospital is the provider of choice for the residents located in our primary and secondary service areas.

Health
4
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
5
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc

The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.

Health
6
Jefferson Memorial Hospital

Jefferson Memorial Hospital is a non-profit critical access hospital serving the residents in the Eastern Panhandle of WV. It operates a 24/7 emergency room. Jefferson Memorial Hospital is organized to provide quality hospital patient care…

Health
7
Wellmont Cardiology Services

Honor those we serve by delivering the best possible care.Ballad Health is dedicated to improving the health of the 29-county Appalachian Highlands region.

Health
8
City Hospital Inc

The mission of City Hospital, Inc. is to provide high quality, cost effective health and wellness services to the community. Berkeley Medical Center provides these to patients in need without consideration of their ability to pay.

Health
9
West Virginia University Medical Corp Charleston Division Dba Wvupc

The mission of West Virginia University School of Medicine Charleston Division d/b/a West Virginia University Physicians of Charleston, is to support the West Virginia University School of Medicine & Improve the lives of our patients,…

Education
10
Webster County Memorial Hospital

The mission of Webster County Memorial Hospital is to provide excellent, high quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—
11
West Virginia University Innovation Corporation

To offer a wide range of strategic partnerships, academia, employment and community opportunities to the state, while promoting innovation and critical thinking within our workforce. Our vision is to catalyze economic growth and improve…

Science & Tech
12
Thomas Health System Inc

Thomas Health System, Inc. is operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes and is the sole member and parent company of the Herbert J. Thomas Memorial Hospital Association, Charleston Hospital, Inc. dba Saint Francis…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Foundation for The Thomas Memorial and Saint Francis Hospitals Inc: $114,298 · HealthThe Foundation for The Thomas Memorial and Saint Francis Hospitals I…WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $15,000 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INCWest Virginia University Hospitals Inc: $10,000 · HealthWest Virginia University Hospitals IncAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncCharleston Professional Baseball Co LLC: $21,500 · OtherCharleston Professional …CAPITAL AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA: $17,000 · OtherCAPITAL AREA DEVELOPMENT…FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV: $15,000 · OtherFAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATI…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationWEST VIRGIN…WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationWEST VIRGIN…YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$149,298Other$53,500Education$25,000Human Services$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Foundation for The Thomas Memorial and Saint Francis Hospitals Inc: $114,298 over 4y, 65% of budgetCAPITAL AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA: $17,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV: $15,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWest Virginia University Hospitals Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas Health System Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas Health System Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas Health System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph