Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MArts & Culture$347kEnvironment$300kCivil Rights$261kEducation$242kPhilanthropy$178kHuman Services$170kCommunity Improvement$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $230k
$39,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS WORLD COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATION$100,000
FAITH & PLAY STORIES$75,000
Individual grant recipient$54,700
SCHOOL OF THE SPIRIT MINISTRY$45,000
FRIENDS UNITED MEETING$39,000
Individual grant recipient$37,500
ARCH STREET MEETING HOUSE$30,000
SANDY SPRINGS FREINDS MEETING$18,000
PUBLIC FRIENDS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT HOME: $20k → 22%FEAST OF JUSTICE: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
RI
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fdlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 19 repeat orgs$656k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$2.6M
$547k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+9%

Still filing today

53%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Pendle Hill
    3× · 2020–2024 · $273k · revenue +30%
  • TQ
    THEE QUAKER PROJECT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +316% · 84% of their budget
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF THE SPIRIT MINISTRY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $174k · revenue +13% · 77% of their budget

Funded once

  • WM
    Wellesley Monthly Meeting of Friends
    one grant, 2022 · $87k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends Council On Education

The mission of the friends council on education is to provide leadership in drawing friends schools together in unity of spirit and cooperative endeavors. the council's work nurtures the quaker life of schools, strengthens the network of…

Education
2
Interfaith Center of Greater Philadelphia

In order to promote social harmony and inter-religious understanding, Interfaith Philadelphia equips individuals and communities for interfaith engagement, builds collaborative relationships, and stands in solidarity with our diverse…

Religion
3
Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends

Our yearly meeting helps local quaker communities find meaning and purpose through interconnection and engagement in a larger network of friends. shared endeavors are good ways to engage with others, and there are many ways of working…

—
4
Friends Rehabilitation Program Inc

Friends rehabilitation program, inc. is a quaker-related nonprofit organization whose mission is to provide housing and social services for low and moderate income households. in addition, the corporation is a developer and manager of…

Housing & Shelter
5
William Penn House

Friends place on capitol hill is a welcoming space that offers hospitality centered in peace, civic education, and justice-based advocacy for learners and leaders of all ages.

Education
6
Friends School of Atlanta

The school's mission is to provide challenging academics in a diverse environment, drawing on the quaker testimonies, or values, of simplicity, peace, integrity, community, equality and stewardship to empower students to go out into the…

—
7
Friends Center Corporation

Friends center corporation seeks to be a place that nurtures awareness of the presence of god, enlivens work for peace and justice, and invites the highest aspirations of the human spirit. as an expression of the beliefs and testimonies of…

Unclassified
8
Fair Food

Fair food is dedicated to bringing locally grown food to the marketplace and to promoting a humane, sustainable agriculture system for the greater philadelphia region

—
9
Friends Association of Services for the Elderly Fase

FASE seeks to provide quality residential, social and health services to the elderly, emphasizing independence, group initiatives and quaker values of integrity, equality, peace, community and simplicity.

—
10
Friend Inc Community Services

Friend inc community services is a multi-services social agency that supports the well-being of those in need and is committed to strengthening the lives of families and individuals living th northeastern berks county.

—
11
Friends Home Association of New York

Provide participatory residential experience based on the religious society of friends principles, in communal household, at moderate cost; meeting space; silent meetings and communal meals; and public education and outreach

Religion
12
Friends Select School

Provide Quaker based education

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quaker Voluntary Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heeding Gods Call. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NAT LEGISLATION: $300,000 · OtherFRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NAT LEGISLATIONFRIENDS WORLD COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATION: $285,052 · OtherFRIENDS WORLD COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATIONIndividual grant recipient: $279,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPendle Hill: $272,952 · OtherPendle HillFAITH & PLAY STORIES: $150,000 · OtherFAITH & PLAY STORIESWellesley Monthly Meeting of Friends: $87,375 · OtherARCH STREET MEETING HOUSE: $77,489 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · Other+21 more: $451,422 · Other+21 moreTHEE QUAKER PROJECT: $250,000 · ReligionTHEE QUAKER PROJECTSCHOOL OF THE SPIRIT MINISTRY: $174,088 · ReligionSCHOOL OF THE SPIRIT …FRIENDS PUBLISHING CORPORATION: $125,000 · ReligionFRIENDS PUBLISHING CO…BEACON HILL FRIENDS HOUSE INC: $87,500 · ReligionBEACON HILL FRIENDS H…+2 more: $25,000 · ReligionEarlham College Inc: $166,000 · EducationMEDIA-PROVIDENCE FRIENDS SCHOOL: $19,000 · EducationVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $178,458 · PhilanthropyQuaker Voluntary Service Inc: $140,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesGreater Philadelphia Film Office: $120,000 · Public BenefitFriends Fiduciary Corporation: $32,600 · Public BenefitMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $20,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCARING FOR FRIENDS: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,053,290Religion$661,588Education$185,000Philanthropy$178,458Human Services$165,000Public Benefit$152,600Food & Nutrition$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPendle Hill: $272,952 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHEE QUAKER PROJECT: $250,000 over 2y, 84% of budgetSCHOOL OF THE SPIRIT MINISTRY: $174,088 over 3y, 77% of budgetEarlham College Inc: $166,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetQuaker Voluntary Service Inc: $140,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetFRIENDS PUBLISHING CORPORATION: $125,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Film Office: $120,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBEACON HILL FRIENDS HOUSE INC: $87,500 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetFriends Fiduciary Corporation: $32,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHISTORIC FAIR HILL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPhilabundance: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA-PROVIDENCE FRIENDS SCHOOL: $19,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARING FOR FRIENDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING A CHANGE GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFEAST OF JUSTICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pendle Hill ↗
  • Who funds THEE QUAKER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF THE SPIRIT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Earlham College Inc ↗
  • Who funds Quaker Voluntary Service Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS PUBLISHING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Philadelphia Film Office ↗
  • Who funds BEACON HILL FRIENDS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends Fiduciary Corporation ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC FAIR HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA-PROVIDENCE FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UJIMA FRIENDS PEACE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Friends Fiduciary CorporationPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Friends Fiduciary Corporation · Snave Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Friends Foundation for the Aging · Obadiah Browns Benevolent Fund · D'Olier Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas H & Mary Williams Shoemaker Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph