Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
THEE QUAKER PROJECT
THEE QUAKER PROJECT (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $419,500 to it, the largest being THOMAS H & MARY WILLIAMS SHOEMAKER FD ($250,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THEE QUAKER PROJECT runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,660 religion nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,660 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Hess Foundation Incshared funders
- Proverbs 327 Foundationportfolio match
- The Ramig Family Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
96% of THEE QUAKER PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $35k → $170k.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 34% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THEE QUAKER PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
THEE QUAKER PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
34% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THEE QUAKER PROJECT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 71% · 2023 74% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
THEE QUAKER PROJECT draws 91% of its grant income from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 2 states in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $145k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 188 organizations that share them.
- Hess Foundation Incshared fundersNJ · backs 16 organizations that share your funders
- Proverbs 327 Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Ramig Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Trinity Christian Center of Santa Anaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lance Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cecil B Day Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Coggin Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Newton Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Jeremiah 924 Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Robert and Martha Trussell Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Anabaptist Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like THEE QUAKER PROJECT
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
65% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THEE QUAKER PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds THEE QUAKER PROJECT?
- THEE QUAKER PROJECT (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $419,500 to it, the largest being THOMAS H & MARY WILLIAMS SHOEMAKER FD ($250,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does THEE QUAKER PROJECT have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $419,500 in grants to THEE QUAKER PROJECT, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of THEE QUAKER PROJECT?
- THOMAS H & MARY WILLIAMS SHOEMAKER FD is the largest funder on record, with $250,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like THEE QUAKER PROJECT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing