Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas Dubois Hormel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$1.0MEducation$425kHealth$240kEnvironment$100k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$50,000
WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$25,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$25,000
HORMEL HISTORIC HOME$25,000
CARNEGIE HALL$25,000
THE PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NEW YORK$25,000
YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE JAY C HORMEL NATURE CENTER$10,000
THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC: $50k → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS: $50k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE HORMEL NATURE CENTER: $50k → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS: $50k → 17%HORMEL HISTORIC HOME: $50k → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS: $50k → 17%HORMEL HISTORIC HOME: $25k → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS: $50k → 17%HORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC: $20k → 10%YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%JUILLIARD SCHOOL FUND: $100k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE HORMEL NATURE CENTER: $20k → 10%YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%JUILLIARD SCHOOL FUND: $100k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE JAY C HORMEL NATURE CENTER: $20k → 10%YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $100k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE JAY C HORMEL NATURE CENTER: $10k → 10%YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $100k → 17%HORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC: $8k → 10%JUILLIARD SCHOOL FUND: $80k → 17%JUILLIARD SCHOOL FUND: $80k → 17%THE PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%THE PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY: $25k → 17%PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY: $25k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $50k → 17%CARNIEGE HALL: $50k → 17%CARNIEGE HALL: $50k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $25k → 17%ROSIE'S THEATER KIDS: $50k → 17%ROSIES THEATRE KIDS: $5k → 17%THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL - LOUIS ARMSTRONG DEPT OF MUSIC THERAPY: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI BETH ISRAEL: $10k → 17%THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI BETH ISRAEL: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Thomas Dubois Hormel Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Thomas Dubois Hormel Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 13 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -70% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-70%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +131%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +30%
  • JS
    JUILLIARD SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • PF
    PATH FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -70%
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL - LOUIS ARMSTRONG DEPT OF MUSIC THERAPY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
2
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
3
Elaine Kaufman Cultural Center Lucy Moses School for Music and Dance

Kaufman music center stimulates appreciation of and participation in music through music performance and education in ways that awaken creativity, advance innovation, and create a sense of wonder among performers, students, teachers, and…

Arts & Culture
4
The Wharton Institute for the Performing Arts Inc

To offer accessible, high-quality performing arts education that sparks personal growth and builds inclusive communities. its vision is to transform performing arts education in an inclusive community accessible to all.

5
Bloomingdale School of Music

To provide access to high-quality music education for anyone who seeks it, regardless of economic status, ability level, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religious affiliation.

Arts & Culture
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Diller-Quaile School of Music Inc

For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…

Arts & Culture
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Society of the Third Street Music School Settlement

The mission of third street music school settlement is to provide access to music and dance education to new yorkers of all ages.

Arts & Culture
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philharmonic Symphony Society of Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JUILLIARD SCHOOL FUND — $360,000 · OtherJUILLIARD SCHOOL FUNDHORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC — $153,000 · OtherHORMEL HISTORIC HOME INCIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+1 more — $10,000 · OtherTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $175,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATIO…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASS…YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATIONROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC — $55,000 · Arts & CultureROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INCTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SO…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $200,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $200,000 · EducationJUILLIARD SCHOOLUniversity of Miami — $25,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiWELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $200,000 · HealthWELLNESS IN TH…BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL ME…THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $10,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE JC HORMEL NATURE CENTER — $100,000 · EnvironmentPATH FUND INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$573,000Arts & Culture$450,000Education$425,000Health$230,000Environment$100,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $200,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $175,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC — $153,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE JC HORMEL NATURE CENTER — $100,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC — $55,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATH FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas Dubois Hormel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas Dubois Hormel Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Thomas Dubois Hormel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph