Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas D Taylor Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$555k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$787kReligion$310kFood & Nutrition$125kInternational$106kEducation$52kYouth Development$52kArts & Culture$27kHousing & Shelter$27kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $525k
  • $250k+1 grant · $555k
$52,185
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MED FDN$554,615
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC$105,583
GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION$105,583
SAMARITANS PURSE$105,583
TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL$52,185
BOYS AND GIRLS AID SOCIETY$52,185
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$52,185
PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION$52,185
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$26,699
OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING FDN INC$26,699
CRYSTAL PEAKS YOUTH RANCH CO$26,699
NAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$26,699
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC$25,480
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $27k → 8%CRYSTAL PEAKS YOUTH RANCH CO: $27k → 10%TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL: $52k → 12%SAMARITANS PURSE: $106k → 21%PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MED FDN: $555k → 8%UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $50k → 12%OREGON FOOD BANK INC: $50k → 12%PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES OREGON: $100k → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS AID SOCIETY: $52k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $50k → 12%OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING FDN INC: $27k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $25k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION: $106k → 12%PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION: $52k → 12%PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital

Legacy Meridian Park Hospital (LMPH), established in 1973, is a community hospital in Tualatin, OR. LMPH is South Metro's most sophisticated medical center and provides the personal touch of a community hospital along with a variety of…

Health
2
Phoenix Gospel Mission

Provide christ-centered, life-transforming solutions to persons facing hunger, homelessness, addiction, and trauma

Religion
3
Bread of Life Mission

Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.

Human Services
4
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

5
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. In 2022 230 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals to 238 clients. We are mission-focused growth-oriented and committed to serving our community.

6
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
7
Skagit Gleaners

Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served

8
Rockford Rescue Mission Ministries

To share hope and help in jesus name to move people from homelessness and despair toward personal and spiritual wholeness. this ministry will serve humanity in the spirit expressed by our lord and savior jesus christ in matthew 25:35-36,…

Education
9
Union Gospel Mission Association of

To provide christ-centered life-transforming pathways to all people experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
10
Siloam Health

Siloam's mission is to share the love of christ by serving those in need through health care.

11
Wyoming Rescue Mission

Wyoming Rescue Mission restores homeless lives to community independence with the love of Christ.

Housing & Shelter
12
Butte Rescue Mission

The Butte Rescue Mission is transforming lives in Jesus's name, offering assistance to those facing homelessness by providing food, shelter and clothing to restore individuals and reunite families, empowering them to reintegrate into…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Gospel Mission and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels People Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MED FDN — $554,615 · OtherPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MED FDNBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC — $105,583 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCPORTLAND RESCUE MISSION — $102,185 · OtherPORTLAND RESCUE MISSIONPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES OREGON — $100,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES OREGONUNION GOSPEL MISSION — $52,185 · OtherTUCKER MAXON SCHOOL — $52,185 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS AID SOCIETY — $52,185 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK — $50,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION — $50,000 · Other+2 more — $53,398 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION — $105,583 · HealthGOOD SAMA…NAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $26,699 · HealthNAMI OF W…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $105,583 · ReligionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $75,480 · Food & NutritionCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co — $26,699 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,172,336Health$132,282Religion$105,583Food & Nutrition$75,480Crime & Legal$26,699

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $105,583 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION — $105,583 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $75,480 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTUCKER MAXON SCHOOL — $52,185 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $26,699 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co — $26,699 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK
  • Who funds NAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
  • Who funds Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas D Taylor Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph