Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas D & Frances N Maher Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$147kHealth$90kFood & Nutrition$33kHuman Services$29kEducation$25kHousing & Shelter$16kScience & Tech$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$12,000
CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN OF PITT$6,000
GEORGETOWN UNION CANCER CENTER$5,000
LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$4,000
PREBORN MINISTRIES$4,000
RETIREMENT FUND FOR THE RELIGIOUS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BLIND & VISIONS REHABILITATION SVCS$2,000
ST MARGARET FOUNDATION$2,000
COOPER SEIGEL COMMUNITY LIBRARY$1,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SECOND HARVEST: $4k → 11%SECOND HARVEST: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
NV
IN
PA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 27 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
9

Total granted

$360k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+14%

Still filing today

33%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +73% · 93% of their budget
  • EW
    ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +98%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • TN
    THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +160%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
2
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
3
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
4
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
5
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
6
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Carlow University

See schedule o.carlow university, rooted in its catholic identity and embodying the heritage and values of the sisters of mercy, offers transformational educational opportunities for a diverse community of learners and empowers them to…

Education
9
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
10
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio

The organization's mission is to improve the health status of the community it serves.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $64,400 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD: $23,000 · OtherGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOODRETIREMENT FUND FOR THE RELIGIOUS: $18,000 · OtherRETIREMENT FUND FOR THE RELIGIOUSCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $16,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONBLIND & VISION REHABILITATION SVS: $14,000 · OtherBLIND & VISION REHABILITATION SVSCATHOLIC CHRISTIAN OF PITT: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNION CANCER CENTER: $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PGH: $10,000 · OtherST SCHOLASTICA CHURCH: $9,000 · Other+12 more: $47,200 · Other+12 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…ST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthST MARGARE…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIB…ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $27,000 · ReligionST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY UNIONTOWN AREA CONFERENCE: $2,000 · ReligionARM MINISTRIES: $1,000 · ReligionGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesSecond Harvest: $6,500 · Human ServicesGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 · International
Other$260,600Health$37,000Religion$30,000Education$27,000Human Services$22,500Food & Nutrition$10,000International$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $64,400 over 9y, 93% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARGARET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY UNIONTOWN AREA CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds ARM MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas D & Frances N Maher Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas D & Frances N Maher Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas D & Frances N Maher Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas D & Frances N Maher Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas D & Frances N Maher Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph