Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas a Todd Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$83kReligion$38kHuman Services$24kHealth$22kEnvironment$20kHousing & Shelter$10kInternational$10kCivil Rights$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$614k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KALAMAZOO MEETING OF RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS$3,500
AACORN$3,000
KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,500
FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES$2,500
KALAMAZOO COLLEGE$2,500
QUAKER EARTHCARE WITNESS$2,500
KALAMAZOO COLLEGE$2,500
COMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS$1,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN$1,500
HOUSING RESOURCES$1,250
WORLD FELLOWSHIP CENTER$1,250
FWCC SECTION OF THE AMERICAS$1,250
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$228k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+22%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KALAMAZOO COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +41%
  • KV
    KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +250%
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • KF
    KALAMAZOO FRIENDS OF RECREATION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • CO
    CITY OF KALAMAZOO
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
Kalamazoo Foundation for Excellence

The mission of the kalamazoo foundation for excellence is to support the goals of the city of kalamazoo, fund aspirational investments in the city, and empower kalamazoo residents to achieve the lives they want for themselves and their…

Public Benefit
3
Kalamazoo Community Foundation

Kalamazoo community foundation's mission is to mobilize people, resources, and expertise to advance racial, social, and economic justice.

Philanthropy
4
Kalamazoo County Humane Society

The mission of the kalamazoo humane society is to nuture the wellbeing of animals and people in our communities.

Animals
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
7
Kalamazoo Community Foundation Real Estate Holdings Inc

Supporting organization to kalamazoo community foundation

Philanthropy
8
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
9
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
10
Kalamazoo County Parks and Recreation Development Foundation

Long term development, stewardship, and protection of michigan parks located in kalamazoo county.

Recreation & Sports
11
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
12
Kalamazoo Symphony Orchestra

The mission of the kalamazoo symphony orchestra is to serve our community through outstanding musical listening and learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalamazoo College; the most unlike its peers is Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KALAMAZOO MEETING OF THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS: $28,000 · OtherKALAMAZOO MEETING OF THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIE…QUAKER EARTHCARE WITNESS: $17,500 · OtherQUAKER EARTHCARE WITNESSCOMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS: $11,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALING CENTERSHOUSING RESOURCES INC: $10,000 · OtherHOUSING RESOURCES INCWORLD FELLOWSHIP CENTER: $10,000 · OtherWORLD FELLOWSHIP CENTERFRIENDS WORLD COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATION: $8,750 · OtherFRIENDS WORLD COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATIONAACORN: $8,000 · OtherAACORNWORLD FEDERALIST MOVEMENT INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $5,750 · Other+3 moreKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $42,500 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLLEGEKALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUN…WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONFAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CH…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $11,000 · HealthBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $8,000 · Crime & Legalworld federalist movementinst for global policy Ltd: $3,750 · InternationalKALAMAZOO FRIENDS OF RECREATION: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$104,000Education$82,500Human Services$24,000Health$11,000Crime & Legal$8,000International$3,750Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $42,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING RESOURCES INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetworld federalist movementinst for global policy Ltd: $3,750 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetQuaker Earthcare Witness: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKALAMAZOO FRIENDS OF RECREATION: $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds world federalist movementinst for global policy Ltd ↗
  • Who funds Quaker Earthcare Witness ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO FRIENDS OF RECREATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Preston S and Barbara J Parish FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Preston S and Barbara J Parish Foundation · Kalamazoo Community Foundation · H P & Genevieve Connable Fund · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas a Todd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas a Todd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas a Todd Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas a Todd Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas a Todd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph