Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas A & Lucille B Horne Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$229kInternational$220kEducation$194kReligion$96kFood & Nutrition$74kHuman Services$61kRecreation & Sports$29kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LDS PHILANTHROPIES$27,500
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Women's Athletic$27,500
Shriner's Hospital$10,000
Primary Childrens Medical Cent$10,000
Utah Food Bank$5,000
Skyline High School$2,500
KUED$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The Road Home: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$872k · 13 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$872k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+34%

Still filing today

23%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LDS PHILANTHROPIES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $220k
  • SL
    Salt Lake Education Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue -26%
  • CO
    Church of Jesus Christ
    3× · 2020–2023 · $95k

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heritage Schools Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • ST
    SHELTER THE HOMELESS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -67%
  • HC
    Huntsman Cancer Institute
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canyons School District Education Foundation

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education
2
Weber County School District Foundation

The mission of the Weber School Foundation is to raise and provide funds to enhance educational goals and opportunities for students.

Education
3
Utah Geological Foundation
—
4
Park City Education Foundation

Our mission is to fund and support educator-powered initiatives that inspire all Park City students to reach their academic and lifelong potential.

Education
5
Timpanogos Academy Foundation

To establish a school where each student gains the scholarly knowledge and skills vital to becoming a self-motivated, lifelong learner and to succeed in the rapidly evolving and complex world. This mission will be accomplished by using the…

Education
6
Salt Lake Arts Academy

To prepare students to become confident and creative builders of their future, equipped through the arts and academics to take responsibility for shaping their communities.

Education
7
University Hospital Foundation

Fundraising for healthcare to support patient care, medical education, and clinical research for University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics and other similar nonprofit organizations.

Philanthropy
8
Utah Valley University Foundation Inc

To assist Utah Valley University (UVU) in fulfilling its objectives: to aid and advance the services of UVU, to raise funds for student scholarships, and to raise funds for University program development.

Education
9
Salt Lake Academy of Music

To provide accessible, experiential music education and performance opportunities that help youth and adults develop musical skills, confidence, and community through collaborative learning.

Arts & Culture
10
The Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind Education Foundation

To provide resources and financial support to meet the unique need of the children and families served by the Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind (USDB).

Education
11
Alpine School District Foundation

To provide funding for Alpine School District schools and students.

Education
12
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salt Lake Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Road Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $219,500 · OtherLDS PHILANTHROPIESChurch of Jesus Christ: $95,000 · OtherChurch of Jesus ChristPrimary Childrens Medical Cent: $87,000 · OtherPrimary Childrens Medical CentShriner's Hospital: $83,000 · OtherShriner's HospitalUTAH FOOD BANK: $74,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $62,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH4th Street Clinic: $46,000 · Other4th Street ClinicST Vincent DePaul Center: $32,000 · Other+14 more: $132,500 · Other+14 moreSalt Lake Education Foundation: $98,225 · PhilanthropySalt Lake E…+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCARDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationAmerican Heritage Schools Inc: $10,000 · EducationGranite Education Foundation: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationTHE ROAD HOME: $6,000 · Human ServicesThe Ocean Foundation: $3,000 · EnvironmentHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $2,000 · Animals
Other$831,500Philanthropy$100,725Education$33,000Human Services$6,000Environment$3,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSalt Lake Education Foundation: $98,225 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $74,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCARDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetAmerican Heritage Schools Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER THE HOMELESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOVERNORS MANSION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetGranite Education Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of MS Charities: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLa Mesa Arts Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Salt Lake Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CARDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heritage Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds GOVERNORS MANSION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Granite Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Friends of MS Charities ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds La Mesa Arts Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Beesley Family FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Beesley Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas A & Lucille B Horne Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas A & Lucille B Horne Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas A & Lucille B Horne’s filings →

    More from the funding graph