Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thistle & Rose Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$245kEducation$205kFood & Nutrition$182kHealth$161kHuman Services$125kInternational$95kHousing & Shelter$85kArts & Culture$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$75,000
CALM$50,000
SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
SANTA BARBARA IMMIGRATION DEFENSE FUND$5,000
WOMENS FUND OF SANTA BARBARA$5,000
SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KESEM: $500 → 19%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $15k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $15k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$881k · 19 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$881k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+33%

Still filing today

74%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +5%
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +33%
  • CI
    CALM INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • SY
    SANTA YNEZ VALLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +33%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +143%
  • GW
    GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +204%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
3
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
4
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Santa Barbara Zoological Foundation

The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.

Animals
7
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
Asante Foundation

The asante foundation's primary exempt purpose is to raise monies and in-kind donations to further the exempt purpose of asante, a 501(c)(3) hospital and healthcare system which services the healthcare needs of the citizens of southern…

Health
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Fund for Santa Barbara Inc

Provide cash grants and free consulting to grassroots organizations in santa barbara county.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr13%37%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,945

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
29/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $115,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $40,000 · OtherNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $30,000 · OtherSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INCSANTA YNEZ VALLEY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherSANTA YNEZ VALLEY FOUNDATIONPARTNERS IN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC — $25,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INCSOLVANG FESTIVAL THEATER — $22,500 · OtherGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $15,000 · OtherSANTA BARBARA IMMIGRATION DEFENSE FUND — $15,000 · OtherSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION — $30,000 · OtherSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION+21 more — $109,500 · Other+21 moreSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $90,000 · PhilanthropySANTA BARBARA FOUN…WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA — $75,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN'S FUND OF SA…The Rona Barrett Foundation — $30,000 · PhilanthropyThe Rona Barrett F…LAKE FOREST ACADEMY — $100,000 · EducationLAKE FOREST ACADE…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $80,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND …+1 more — $5,000 · EducationFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $175,000 · Food & NutritionFoodbank of Santa…+2 more — $7,000 · Food & NutritionCALM INC — $90,000 · Crime & LegalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $85,000 · InternationalWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $35,000 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human Services
Other$432,000Philanthropy$195,000Education$185,000Food & Nutrition$182,000Crime & Legal$90,000International$85,000Human Services$35,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $175,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALM INC — $90,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA — $75,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetThe Rona Barrett Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSANTA YNEZ VALLEY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA DEL HERRERO — $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPONDYLITIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHorsefeathers Therapeutic Riding NFP — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetADVANCING COLLECTIVE TRANSFORMATION (FKA UFFIZI ORDER)(DBA-SBACT) — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSchoolCARE — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetIN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT — $3,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIC SOUP KITCHEN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPAW WORKS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Kesem National — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara Foundat…Ann Jackson Family Fo…Hutton Foundation Dba…Towbes FoundationWilliams-Corbett Foun…AbbVie FoundationBarbara N Rubin Found…Alice Tweed Tuohy Fou…Latkin Charitable Fou…June G Outhwaite Char…G a Fowler Family Fou…Patricia Bragg Founda…
Santa Barbara FoundationCA23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Barbara N Rubin Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · G a Fowler Family Foundation · Patricia Bragg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thistle & Rose Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines