Skip to content

· Private foundation

Theodores Family Foundation Theodores

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$450
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Youth Development$4kHealth$3kReligion$900Human Services$825Environment$400
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINE BOYS TO MEN$450
SCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST$350
MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM$269
STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN CHURCH$250
CARBON 180$150
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE$150
CENTER FOR GRIVING CHILDREN$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%NAMI CAPE COD: $100 → 8%NATL MS SOCIETY: $100 → 8%STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN: $250 → 11%CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE: $150 → 16%CARBON 180: $150 → 14%MAINE BOYS TO MEN: $1k → 7%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $100 → 8%STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN CHURCH: $250 → 11%MAINE BOYS TO MEN: $1k → 7%SCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST: $350 → 8%STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN: $200 → 11%MAINE BOYS TO MEN: $832 → 7%SCOTTISH RITE: $327 → 8%ST CONST AND HELEN: $200 → 11%MAINE BOYS TO MEN: $795 → 7%MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $269 → 8%MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $200 → 11%MAINE BOYS TO MEN: $450 → 7%SCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST: $250 → 8%CENTER FOR GRIVING CHILDREN: $125 → 7%MASONIC ANGEL FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY: $100 → 7%MASONIC ANGEL FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%SCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST: $250 → 8%SCOTTISH RITE: $200 → 8%MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $100 → 8%MASONIC ANGEL FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $100 → 8%MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $100 → 8%SCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST: $100 → 8%CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of Theodores Family Foundation Theodores’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 52%.

Theodores Family Foundation Theodoreslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 46% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8k · 7 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -22% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$8k
$600

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
-33%

Still filing today

43%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $675 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MAINE BOYS TO MEN
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue -22%
  • SR
    SCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST
    4× · 2017–2022 · $950
  • MH
    MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM
    5× · 2017–2022 · $769

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CONST AND HELEN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200
  • CF
    CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $100
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CASCO BAYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100 · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Maine

Provides Advocacy, Education, Support, and Awareness so that individuals, families, and communities affected by Mental Illness can live fulfilling lives.

Health
2
Nami Rhode Island

The mission of NAMI Rhode Island is to educate the public about mental illness; to offer resources and support to all whose lives are touched by mental illness; to advocate at every level to ensure the rights and dignity of those with…

Health
3
Manufacturers Association of Maine

The manufacturers association of maine is dedicated to promoting and strengthening manufacturing in maine as an informative voice for the state's manufacturing community.

—
4
Maine Medical Association

To support maine physicians, advance the quality of medicine in maine, and promote the health of all maine people.

—
5
Maine Climate Action Now

MCAN catalyzes transformative education and action in response to the climate crisis. We seek to honor, unite and amplify the voices of youth, frontline communities, and others historically excluded from the climate conversation and…

Environment
6
Maine Society of Cpas

The maine society of certified public accountants is the statewide professional organization for cpas in maine. the society serves approximately 575 members with professional meetings, education, and advocacy.

Education
7
Autism Society of Maine d/b/a Asm

The Autism Society of Maine provides education and resources to support the valued lives of individuals on the autism spectrum and their families.

Human Services
8
Maine Rivers

Maine Rivers is a statewide advocacy organization. Our mission is to protect, restore and enhance the ecological health of Maine's river systems. We support and direct efforts to conserve and improve the health of Maine's rivers and…

Environment
9
Adoptive & Foster Families of Maine

Adoptive and foster families of maine inc. provides support services for adoptive and foster parents, and kinship providers. affm provides the training, guidance, knowledge, and resources needed to handle complex issues as families open…

Human Services
10
Catf Action Inc

Educating and informing the public about the challenges of climate change and related legislative and administrative developments, government positions and actions, and policy initiatives and proposals; making policy recommendations; and…

Environment
11
National Alliance On Mental Illness of Massachusetts Inc

We seek to improve the quality of life for people living with mental health conditions, their families, and their caregivers. we work to ensure that all people impacted by a mental health condition receive the support they need when they…

Health
12
Maine Prisoner Advocacy Coalition

Our mission is to support and advocate for maines incarcerated citizens, their families and friends. our purpose is to reduce maines use of incarceration by advocating for a legal system that is ethical, humane and restorative. our vision…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAINE BOYS TO MEN: $4,093 · Youth DevelopmentMAINE BOYS TO MEN+1 more: $125 · Youth DevelopmentSCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUST: $950 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE LEGACY TRUSTMASONIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $769 · OtherMASONIC HEALTH SYSTEMIndividual grant recipient: $527 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTS CONSTANTINE & HELEN CHURCH: $250 · OtherSTS CONSTANTINE & HELEN CHURCHST CONST AND HELEN: $200 · OtherST CONST AND HELEN+2 more: $200 · Other+2 moreBEEHIVE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $600 · PhilanthropyCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $150 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $150 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF CASCO BAY: $100 · EnvironmentNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $200 · HealthFamily Hope: $100 · Health
Youth Development$4,218Other$3,346Philanthropy$600Environment$400Health$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAINE BOYS TO MEN: $4,093 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBEEHIVE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASCO BAY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Hope: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI CAPE COD INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAINE BOYS TO MEN ↗
  • Who funds BEEHIVE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY ↗
  • Who funds Family Hope ↗
  • Who funds NAMI CAPE COD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Theodores Family Foundation Theodores funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Theodores Family Foundation Theodores. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Theodores Family Foundation Theodores’ filings →

    More from the funding graph