Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wisteria Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$130kHousing & Shelter$71kPublic Benefit$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kAnimals$59kEducation$42kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY SPIRIT LUTHERAN CHURCH$17,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
BOCA HELPING HANDS$5,000
THE LORDS PLACE$5,000
PEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE$4,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FRIENDS OF NPB LIBRARY$2,500
S FLORIDA CARE ALLIANCE INC$2,500
PROJECT HOME$2,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,500
LITERARY COALITION OR PB COUNTY$1,500
BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PLACE OF HOPE: $5k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CT
UT
KY
KS
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$558k · 28 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$558k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+78%

Still filing today

43%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LORD'S PLACE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +101%
  • BH
    BOCA HELPING HANDS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +121%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    7× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • AH
    ANDREW HICKS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
5
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
8
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
9
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
10
The Children's Home of Pittsburgh

The children's home of pittsburgh, established in 1893, is an independent, non-profit licensed organization whose purpose is to promote the health and well-being of infants and children through services which establish and strengthen the…

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Country Week Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY SPIRIT LUTHERAN CHURCH INC: $129,700 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT LUTHERAN CHURCH INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSHSLC: $48,300 · OtherHSLCPEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $33,000 · OtherPEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUEFAMILY PROMISE: $17,500 · OtherTUNNEL TO TAVERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+16 more: $88,500 · Other+16 moreTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL: $14,000 · EducationANDREW L HICKS JR FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationPROJECT HOME: $20,000 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $14,000 · AnimalsTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $12,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $150 · Health
Other$392,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Education$36,100Human Services$32,500Animals$26,000Health$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S COUNTRY WEEK ASSOC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetANDREW L HICKS JR FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida State University Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S COUNTRY WEEK ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds ANDREW L HICKS JR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wisteria Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wisteria Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Lord's Place Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wisteria’s filings →

More from the funding graph