Skip to content

· Public charity

The Wings Club Foundation Inc

To foster educational opportunities for students pursuing an education in aviation.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.4MPublic Safety & Disaster$75kInternational$50kHealth$50k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY$110,000
VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY$65,000
WINGS OF HOPE$25,000
TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY$20,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$10,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$10,000
CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE$10,000
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 8%CORPORATE ANGEL: $25k → 9%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $65k → 13%AIRLINK INC: $25k → 14%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $110k → 12%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 32%WINGS OF HOPE: $25k → 11%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE: $10k → 22%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 8%CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK: $25k → 9%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $62k → 13%AIRLINK INC: $25k → 14%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $98k → 12%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 32%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE: $10k → 22%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 8%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 13%AIRLINK INC: $25k → 14%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $76k → 12%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 32%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE: $10k → 22%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 8%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 13%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 32%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE: $10k → 22%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 8%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 13%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 32%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 8%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 13%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS & TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 13%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IN
MO
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-31%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $444k · revenue +61%
  • CO
    Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $130k · revenue +48%
  • TU
    Tuskegee University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
4
The Aerospace Corporation

Our purpose is to assist the government and other customers in conception, design, acquisition and operations of space and other complex systems. Mission: Working to improve effectiveness for space operations and end-user communities,…

Science & Tech
5
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Asia Ltd

The mission of embry-riddle aeronautical university, asia ltd (erau asia) is to extend embry-riddle aeronautical university, inc.'s (erau) opportunity for delivering higher education and research in aviation and aerospace in key countries…

Education
6
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tuskegee University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $444,000 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INCVAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY: $337,000 · EducationVAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGYChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $130,000 · EducationChildren of Fallen Patriots FoundationTuskegee University: $110,000 · EducationTuskegee UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $70,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE …UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYL…WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherAIRLINK INC: $75,000 · InternationalAIRLINK I…WINGS OF HOPE: $25,000 · InternationalWINGS OF …PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · InternationalPROJECT O…CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Health
Education$1,091,000Other$260,000International$125,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $444,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY: $337,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $130,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTuskegee University: $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAIRLINK INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
  • Who funds AIRLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wings Club Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wings Club Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wings Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph