Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Winchester Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$679kArts & Culture$242kSocial Science$44kCivil Rights$40kCrime & Legal$38kHuman Services$28kPhilanthropy$25kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$34,450
BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE$10,000
INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE$10,000
THE ASHBROOK CENTER$10,000
INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION$10,000
RANDOLPH COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION$10,000
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$7,500
IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,294
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH$5,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$5,000
WINCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$5,000
LINCOLN COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
MINNETRISTA CULTURAL CENTER$5,000
INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE STUDIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $8k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $10k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $10k → 13%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 9%THE REMNANT TRUST INC: $15k → 18%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $56k → 19%ASHBROOK CENTER: $18k → 11%BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $10k → 7%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $8k → 10%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $8k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $8k → 13%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 9%INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%THE BRIAN BEX REPORT INC DBA AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK: $13k → 18%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $39k → 19%THE ASHBROOK CENTER: $10k → 11%BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $8k → 7%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $8k → 10%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $8k → 14%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $239k → 15%INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION CO WE THE PEOPLE: $8k → 16%THE REMNANT TRUST INC: $10k → 18%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $34k → 19%THE ASHBROOK CENTER: $10k → 11%BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $8k → 7%RANDOLPH COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION CO WE THE PEOPLE: $8k → 16%THE REMNANT TRUST INC: $10k → 18%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $34k → 19%THE ASHBROOK CENTER: $10k → 11%INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE STUDIES: $6k → 7%RANDOLPH COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION CO WE THE PEOPLE: $8k → 16%THE BRIAN BEX REPORT INC DBA AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK: $8k → 18%RANDOLPH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 15%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $13k → 16%IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 18%IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 18%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $8k → 7%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $8k → 7%RANDOLPH COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION: $13k → 15%RANDOLPH COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%RANDOLPH COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%HISTORIC FARMLAND USA: $13k → 15%HISTORIC FARMLAND USA: $9k → 15%HISTORIC FARMLAND USA: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
OH
VA
DE
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$754k · 26 repeat orgs$402k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
29

Total granted

$754k
$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+33%

Still filing today

38%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE REMNANT TRUST INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +61%
  • IS
    INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +45%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • WC
    Walbash College
    one grant, 2019 · $132k
  • TU
    Taylor University
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • BU
    Butler University
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
10
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
11
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
12
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation of Randolph County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $163,928 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYWalbash College: $131,810 · OtherWalbash CollegeRandolph County Art Association: $67,500 · OtherRandolph County Art AssociationTaylor University: $35,347 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $32,500 · Other+44 more: $493,381 · Other+44 moreASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $48,000 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSI…INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $36,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE …HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $32,500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEG…Trine University: $25,859 · EducationTrine UniversitySTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $22,500 · EducationSTUDENTS FOR LIB…Butler University: $13,250 · EducationButler Universit…THE REMNANT TRUST INC: $39,832 · Arts & CultureFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $30,500 · Social ScienceINDIANA BAR FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$924,466Education$178,109Arts & Culture$39,832Social Science$30,500Crime & Legal$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $48,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REMNANT TRUST INC: $39,832 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $36,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $30,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBill of Rights Institute: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTrine University: $25,859 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA BAR FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetButler University: $13,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOBART INSTITUTE OF WELDING TECHNOLOGY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE REMNANT TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
  • Who funds Trine University ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Butler University ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pierre F & Enid Goodrich FoundationIN15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pierre F & Enid Goodrich Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winchester Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winchester Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Winchester Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Winchester Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Winchester’s filings →

    More from the funding graph