Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William R Hoch Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$980k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of THE WILLIAM R HOCH FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $951k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$200,000
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY$101,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$100,000
THE CARTER CENTER$100,000
MARY'S MEALS$100,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100,000
SDSU FOUNDATION$50,000
BESEDA HALL$20,000
ST LEO'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $50k → 17%THE CARTER CENTER: $150k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $150k → 22%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $100k → 14%MARY'S MEALS: $230k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 5%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $104k → 9%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $200k → 19%FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMERS: $100k → 17%THE CARTER CENTER: $100k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100k → 22%MARY'S MEALS: $100k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 5%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $101k → 9%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE FOUNDATION: $150k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $200k → 19%FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMERS: $50k → 17%THE CARTER CENTER: $100k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100k → 22%MARY'S MEALS: $100k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $86k → 9%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $150k → 19%THE CARTER CENTER: $100k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100k → 22%MARY'S MEALS: $100k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $73k → 9%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%ST LEO'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $250k → 15%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $100k → 19%THE CARTER CENTER: $100k → 14%MARY'S MEALS: $100k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $68k → 9%SDSU FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%BON HOMME SCHOOL DISTRICT: $230k → 15%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $100k → 19%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $60k → 9%COUNTY OF BON HOMME: $150k → 15%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%ST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCH: $145k → 15%CITY OF TYNDALL: $126k → 15%ST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCH: $115k → 15%ST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCH: $93k → 15%CITY OF TYNDALL: $79k → 15%VFW: $71k → 15%ELLIOT HOSE CO INC: $69k → 15%ST LEO'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $60k → 15%BON HOMME SCHOOL DISTRICT: $52k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
SD
NJ
CO
NE
MD
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 16 repeat orgs$467k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$6.1M
$343k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+32%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $760k · revenue +38%
  • MM
    Mary's Meals USA Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $680k · revenue +159%
  • TZ
    THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $400k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNTY OF BON HOMME
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
  • V
    VFW
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
  • EH
    ELLIOT HOSE CO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $69k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

3
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

4
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
5
Zebrafish Disease Models Society

Zebrafish disease models society aims to act as a meeting point for academic, clinical and industrial scientists using zebrafish disease models and to support and foster knowledge generation, discussion, training and education about…

Health
6
Alzheimer's Impact Movement

To advance and develop policies to overcome alzheimer's and all other dementia through increased investment in research, enhanced care and improved support.

Health
7
University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc

Umms foundation, inc. raises charitable funds to safeguard the future of health care excellence for university of maryland medical system.

Education
8
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
9
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

10
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

11
Meriter Foundation Inc

Meriter foundation exists to raise and manage gifts in support of the programs and services that advance the mission of meriter hospital, inc.

Philanthropy
12
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary's Meals Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $900,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSOUTH DAKOTA STATE FOUNDATION — $550,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $450,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCH — $353,000 · OtherST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCHST LEO'S CATHOLIC CHURCH — $315,000 · OtherST LEO'S CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $310,167 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBON HOMME SCHOOL DISTRICT — $281,721 · OtherBON HOMME SCHOOL DISTRICTCOUNTY OF BON HOMME — $150,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS — $150,000 · Other+11 more — $242,666 · Other+11 moreTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $760,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCMary's Meals USA Inc — $680,000 · InternationalMary's Meals USA IncMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $150,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES US…GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY INC — $621,597 · Housing & ShelterGOOD SAMAR…THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $400,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Education
Other$3,702,554International$1,590,000Housing & Shelter$621,597Health$505,000Education$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $760,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMary's Meals USA Inc — $680,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY INC — $621,597 over 9y, 41% of budgetTHE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBESEDA HALL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCommunity Hospital Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC
  • Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BESEDA HALL INC
  • Who funds Community Hospital Foundation

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William R Hoch Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The William R Hoch Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The William R Hoch Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph