Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William E Hixson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$228k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.1MYouth Development$205kRecreation & Sports$72kEmployment$70kEnvironment$60kScience & Tech$50kHousing & Shelter$20kInternational$20k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$28,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL EDUCATION$50,000
AFS$40,000
ENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH$35,000
YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING$28,000
CIEF$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAL STORM: $35k → 6%YOUCUBED: $30k → 8%MIND RESEARCH: $50k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION - ICO RAFTING: $12k → 10%ENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH: $35k → 10%PROJECT LIFELONG SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%ECOLOGIK: $10k → 11%CIEF: $25k → 12%EL EDUCATION: $50k → 17%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $50k → 14%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $50k → 18%CAL STORM: $25k → 6%MIND RESEARCH: $50k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE LEARNING CHOICES ACADEMY: $10k → 11%CIEF: $25k → 12%EL EDUCATION: $50k → 17%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $50k → 14%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $45k → 18%MIND RESEARCH: $50k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%CONSTRUCITON INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%EL EDUCATION: $50k → 17%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $43k → 18%MIND RESEARCH: $50k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%LOS RIOS COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $35k → 12%EL EDUCATION: $50k → 17%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $28k → 18%MIND RESEARCH: $50k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%AFS: $40k → 17%YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $10k → 18%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%LOS RIOS: $15k → 12%AFS: $30k → 17%CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%AFS: $30k → 17%LOS RIOS COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%AFS: $30k → 17%CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%AFS-USA: $20k → 17%LOS RIOS: $15k → 12%PROJECT LIFELONG: $20k → 12%THE LOS RIOS COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%PROJECT LIFELONG: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 13 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+3%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $70k · revenue +520%
  • LR
    Los Rios Colleges Foundation
    3× · 2019–2023 · $70k · revenue +198%
  • PL
    PROJECT LIFELONG
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CI
    CONSTRUCITON INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • PL
    PROJECT LIFELONG SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
2
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
3
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
6
Junior Achievement of Sacramento Inc

Provide in school programs that educate and inspire young people to value free enterprise, understand business, economics and improve the quality of their lives.

International
7
San Luis Coastal Education Foundation

Partner with public and private sectors to support creative and innovative programs for the benefit of students of the san luis coastal unified school district in the areas of academics, arts, career technical education, extra-curricular…

Education
8
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
9
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
10
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
11
Cabrillo Education Foundation

Cef is serving as a student success innovation fund to promote new, creative and powerful initiatives to improve students' education in our community. it is an advocate for and funds high leverage programs that have well defined outcomes…

—
12
East Palo Alto Academy Foundation

East palo alto academy foundation advocates for, advances, and raises funds to benefit the students and graduates of east palo alto academy, a charter school of the sequoia union high school district. our programs and resources are in…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Construction Industry Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING: $276,130 · OtherYOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDINGIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOU CUBED STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherYOU CUBED STANFORD UNIVERSITYAFS: $130,000 · OtherAFSLos Rios Colleges Foundation: $70,000 · OtherLos Rios Colleges FoundationYOUCUBED: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherCIEF: $50,000 · Other+7 more: $137,000 · Other+7 moreEL EDUCATION INC: $200,000 · EducationEL EDUCATION INCCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY …PROJECT LIFELONG: $40,000 · EducationPROJECT LIFELONG+1 more: $10,000 · EducationSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentAFS-USA INC: $20,000 · International
Other$1,183,130Education$320,000Environment$50,000Youth Development$35,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL EDUCATION INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetLos Rios Colleges Foundation: $70,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LIFELONG: $40,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetAFS-USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEARNING CHOICE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Los Rios Colleges Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LIFELONG ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds AFS-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING CHOICE ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William E Hixson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William E Hixson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William E Hixson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph