Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William B and Anngenette G Tyler Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$51kInternational$26kEmployment$20kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$13kEducation$11kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREAMCATCHER INITIATIVE$10,000
KIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND$10,000
Plugged In Band Program$7,500
Manna Food Bank$5,000
Community of Hope(for Kindness Connection)$5,000
COACHING4CHANGE$5,000
United Way of NC$5,000
Veterans Ride for Free$5,000
Girls on the Run Vermont$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFE FUTURES: $2k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $2k → 8%IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of The William B and Anngenette G Tyler Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 74% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The William B and Anngenette G Tyler Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$94k · 7 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
26

Total granted

$94k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +145%
  • BU
    BREAKTIME UNITED INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +770%
  • DI
    DREAMCATCHER INITIATIVE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • MORE THAN WORDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +66%
  • CO
    CIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Upward Project

To provide low income, first generation students who attend selective colleges the skills and resources they need to succeed in college and graduate prepared for careers in competitive and high wage fields. To seek upward mobility for…

Education
2
Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education
3
Friends of the Children - Boston Inc

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Human Services
4
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
5
Waltham Partnership for Youth Inc

Waltham partnership for youth collaborates with youth, families, and partner organizations to address long-standing systemic inequities while building a community of belonging and opportunity for waltham youth. we envision a world where…

Human Services
6
Educational Divide Reform Inc

Educational divide reform, inc. advances the mission to promote global citizenship education, social inclusion and community development through youth education.

Unclassified
7
Massachusetts Advocates for Children Inc

Massachusetts advocates for children, inc. ("mac") is a non-profit organization dedicated to removing barriers to educational and life opportunities for children and youth. we do so by advocating for and partnering with students and…

Civil Rights
8
United Way of Greater New Bedford Inc

Our mission is to mobilize people, partnerships and resources to catalyze change that strengthens the communities served.

9
Boston Partners in Education Inc

By creating supportive relationships between students and volunteer mentors, boston partners in education ensures a more equitable city where every bps student is equipped with the skills, opportunity, and confidence to succeed in the…

10
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
11
Child Care of the Berkshires Inc

The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…

12
Think Big for Kids Inc

Think big for kids is breaking the cycle of poverty by providing middle and high school students with career opportunities, mentorship, and job readiness training to excel in today's workforce.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is More Than Words Inc and the most unlike its peers is Circle of Care for Families of Children With Cancer Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Youth Sports Booster Organi…United Way FederationsCancer Support OrganizationsAt-Risk Youth MentoringIndependent K-8 SchoolsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & AssistanceEducation Equity LeadershipGovernment Accountability R…Native Hawaiian Community D…Elementary Literacy Tutoring
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr14%16%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr14%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr14%28%5–10yr20%37%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr14%0%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,326

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORE THAN WORDS INC — $8,000 · OtherMORE THAN WORDS INCGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCCommunity of Hope(for Kindness Connection) — $5,000 · OtherCommunity of Hope(for Kindness Connection)Individual grant recipient — $2,800 · OtherSIDNEY BORUM JR HEALTH CENTER — $2,600 · OtherACTION INC-COMPASS YOUTH PROGRAM — $2,600 · OtherMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · OtherMANNA FOOD BANK INCGLADIOLUS FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,000 · OtherGLADIOLUS FOOD PANTRY INCPLUGGED IN BAND PROGRAM INC — $7,500 · OtherPLUGGED IN BAND PROGRAM INCUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $5,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINACIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC — $5,000 · OtherCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WI…VETERANS RIDE FOR FREE — $5,000 · OtherVETERANS RIDE FOR FREE+9 more — $13,020 · Other+9 moreKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $26,000 · InternationalKIJABE CHILDREN…HOUSE OF PEACE INC — $1,000 · InternationalDREAMCATCHER INITIATIVE INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMCATCHER …GIRLS ON THE RUN OF VERMONT INC — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE …COACHING FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 · EducationCOACHING FOR …OPENING DOORS FOR WESTERLY'S CHILDREN — $2,660 · EducationOPENING DOORS…STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC — $1,900 · EducationSTEPPINGSTONE…CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION — $1,660 · EducationCHILDREN'S LI…THE MAKAYLA FUND INC — $1,000 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationBREAKTIME UNITED INC — $20,000 · EmploymentBREAKTIME U…HomeStart Inc — $6,900 · Community ImprovementBEAR PROJECT INC — $4,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $3,000 · Community ImprovementIMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $1,700 · Human ServicesSafe Futures Inc — $1,660 · Human Services
Other$71,520International$27,000Youth Development$23,500Education$22,720Employment$20,000Community Improvement$13,900Human Services$13,360

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $26,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBREAKTIME UNITED INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDREAMCATCHER INITIATIVE INC — $20,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLUGGED IN BAND PROGRAM INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHomeStart Inc — $6,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLADIOLUS FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS RIDE FOR FREE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBEAR PROJECT INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF VERMONT INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPENING DOORS FOR WESTERLY'S CHILDREN — $2,660 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC — $1,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC — $1,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS — $1,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE INC — $1,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIFTS TO GIVE INC — $1,660 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSafe Futures Inc — $1,660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION — $1,660 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR TEEN EMPOWERMENT INC — $1,660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAKAYLA FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHOUSE OF PEACE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLA VIDA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA24× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The John H and H Naomi Tomfohrde Foundation · George H & Jane a Mifflin Memorial Fund · Wagner Foundation · The Hyams Foundation Inc · The Clowes Fund Incorporated · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William B and Anngenette G Tyler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Dreamcatcher Initiative Inc100% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • HomeStart Inc20% of income from government
  • Safe Futures Inc15% of income from government
  • La Vida Inc11% of income from government
  • The Center for Teen Empowerment Inc7% of income from government
  • Coaching for Change Inc5% of income from government
  • Breaktime United Inc1% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc0% of income from government
  • Steppingstone Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The William B and Anngenette G Tyler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The William B and Anngenette G Tyler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph