Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wilcox Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$500
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.5MPublic Benefit$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.3MEducation$416kYouth Development$90kPhilanthropy$84kHuman Services$43kHousing & Shelter$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLYMOUTH ROTARY CLUB$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GROWTHWORKS: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 22 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
34

Total granted

$2.8M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+13%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLYMOUTH PARC INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +24% · 28% of their budget
  • PC
    PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +88%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF PLYMOUTH
    one grant, 2021 · $1.3M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • PE
    PLYMOUTH EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
7
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
8
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
11
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
12
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Siena Heights University; the most unlike its peers is New Morning School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PLYMOUTH: $1,269,834 · OtherCITY OF PLYMOUTHPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL: $1,129,440 · OtherPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLYMOUTH EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION+36 more: $440,101 · Other+36 morePLYMOUTH PARC INC: $1,240,500 · Community ImprovementPLYMOUTH PARC INC+1 more: $9,000 · Community ImprovementPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY UNITED WAY: $81,400 · PhilanthropyHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,700 · EducationADRIAN COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationUniversity of the Pacific: $3,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $2,500 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationRhodes College: $2,000 · EducationUniversity of Dayton: $2,000 · EducationSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $2,000 · EducationALMA COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE PENN INC: $23,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $750 · Arts & CultureGROWTH WORKS INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$3,389,375Community Improvement$1,249,500Philanthropy$81,400Education$32,200Arts & Culture$23,750Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLYMOUTH PARC INC: $1,240,500 over 5y, 28% of budgetPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL: $1,129,440 over 6y, 13% of budgetPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY UNITED WAY: $81,400 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF COLONIAL PLYMOUTH: $52,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PENN INC: $23,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH FIFE & DRUM CORPS: $13,250 over 1y, 14% of budgetMichigan Philharmonic: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $9,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetNEW MORNING SCHOOL: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGROWTH WORKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLYMOUTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLYMOUTH PARC INC ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF COLONIAL PLYMOUTH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PENN INC ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH FIFE & DRUM CORPS ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Philharmonic ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MORNING SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GROWTH WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret Dunning FoundationMI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret Dunning Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wilcox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wilcox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wilcox Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Wilcox Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wilcox’s filings →

More from the funding graph