Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roaring Brook Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Environment$3.9MEducation$3.4MFood & Nutrition$2.6MYouth Development$983kArts & Culture$809kAnimals$528kCivil Rights$380kCommunity Improvement$310kOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $660k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENAGERS$125,000
SHELBURNE FARMS$125,000
BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES$100,000
EARTH JUSTICE$100,000
CHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY$100,000
COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE$100,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$100,000
ROOTS RISING$100,000
TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$100,000
ROOTS RISING$75,000
VERMONT FARMERS FOOD CENTER$65,000
INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF-RELIANCE$50,000
TELLING ROOM$50,000
HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL$50,000
LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $3k → 8%THE COMPAGNA CENTER: $1k → 9%NON-PROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $15k → 12%NON-PROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Roaring Brook Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 54% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Roaring Brook Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 90 repeat orgs$698k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
34

Total granted

$12M
$571k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+15%

Still filing today

86%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PUTNEY SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +76%
  • RR
    ROOTS RISING INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $510k · revenue +820%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $475k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +33%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF THE BERKSHIRES
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • TC
    TRIPLEX CINEMA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
2
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
3
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
4
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
7
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
8
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
9
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
10
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saint Helena Island Gullah Community Housing Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food System Organizat…Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsDance Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Independent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/112
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,453

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/110
Grantees still filing
75/110
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EARTHJUSTICE — $475,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $425,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYEcology Education Inc — $375,000 · EnvironmentEcology Education IncSHELBURNE FARMS — $326,000 · EnvironmentSHELBURNE FARMSHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL — $275,000 · EnvironmentHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOU…WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $250,000 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INCTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $200,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONSBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC — $181,000 · EnvironmentCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC — $150,000 · EnvironmentTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC — $140,000 · Environment+18 more — $740,500 · Environment+18 morePUTNEY SCHOOL INC — $1,325,000 · OtherPUTNEY SCHOOL INCCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE — $375,000 · OtherCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUEFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $200,000 · OtherST JOHNS COLLEGE IN SANTA FE — $175,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC — $175,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $250,000 · OtherGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $400,000 · OtherGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTEINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $197,500 · Other+58 more — $1,590,500 · Other+58 moreROOTS RISING INC — $510,000 · Food & NutritionROOTS RISING IN…GREENAGERS INC — $400,000 · Food & NutritionGREENAGERS INCFRESHFARM MARKETS — $370,000 · Food & NutritionFRESHFARM MARKE…BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC — $282,500 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE AGRIC…Salvation Farms Inc — $90,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC — $82,500 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC — $75,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more — $95,000 · Food & NutritionPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,100,000 · EducationPresident and …VERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER — $220,000 · EducationVERMONT FARMER…CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $200,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF…ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $175,000 · EducationESPERANZA ACAD…+7 more — $139,000 · Education+7 moreLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER — $353,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Telling Room — $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY — $275,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $150,000 · InternationalCONTEXTOS NFP — $90,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $77,500 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $70,000 · InternationalTHE WOMEN'S BAKERY INC — $25,000 · International+2 more — $21,000 · InternationalWAVE FARM INC — $185,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureSILK ROAD PROJECT INC — $56,000 · Arts & CultureTRIPLEX CINEMA INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RICHMOND BALLET — $30,000 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE COMMUNITY RADIO ALLIANCE INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GREENFIELD REVIEW LITERARY CENTER INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $21,000 · Arts & Culture
Environment$3,537,500Other$4,688,000Food & Nutrition$1,905,000Education$1,834,000Youth Development$808,000International$708,500Arts & Culture$492,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC — $1,325,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS RISING INC — $510,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $475,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $425,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $400,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGREENAGERS INC — $400,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetEcology Education Inc — $375,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetFRESHFARM MARKETS — $370,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER — $353,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Telling Room — $350,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS — $326,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC — $282,500 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL — $275,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY — $275,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $250,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $250,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER — $220,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $200,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $197,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWAVE FARM INC — $185,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC — $181,000 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $175,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC — $175,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $150,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC — $150,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC — $140,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHOPEFUL HORIZONS — $122,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION — $119,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetTHE ORION SOCIETY INC — $117,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCONTEXTOS NFP — $90,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSalvation Farms Inc — $90,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC — $82,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetVOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION — $80,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $77,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC — $75,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL CORP — $57,500 over 8y, 3.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUTNEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GREENAGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ecology Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRESHFARM MARKETS ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Telling Room ↗
  • Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WAVE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEFUL HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds PEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ORION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Com…The Feigenbaum Founda…Berkshire Bank Founda…Agnes M Lindsay TrustMaine Community Found…Jane and Jack Fitzpat…Boston Foundation IncThe Vermont Community…Geoffrey C Hughes Fou…Oristaglio Family Fou…Lee Bank Foundation I…Dan and Merrie Boone …
Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA28× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc · Oristaglio Family Foundation · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Dan and Merrie Boone Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roaring Brook Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Housatonic River Initiative Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc — 47% of income from government
  • Housatonic Valley Association Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Salvation Farms Inc — 26% of income from government
  • EcoHealth Alliance Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Osamequin Farm Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc — 18% of income from government
  • The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis — 17% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Roots Rising Inc — 6% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
  • The Boston Camerata Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Silk Road Project Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
  • Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
  • The Orion Society Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roaring Brook Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roaring Brook Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines