Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Whitehead Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$263k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$653kArts & Culture$438kHealth$343kYouth Development$185kEducation$138kCivil Rights$120kPhilanthropy$103kEnvironment$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $147k
$14,100
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE$97,000
RAISING EXPECTATIONS INC$50,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$37,500
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$25,000
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE$14,100
THE PLACE$12,500
EARTH JUSTICE$10,600
RAINFOREST TRUST$7,000
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE$7,000
BICYLE COALITION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PLACE: $13k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 13 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$2.1M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+34%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCivil RightsEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $750k · revenue +131%
  • BC
    BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $423k · revenue +18%
  • RE
    RAISING EXPECTATIONS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $235k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    COOLIDGE CORNER THEATER
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • RT
    RAINFOREST TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
3
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
6
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
7
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
8
The Urban Land Institute

Shape the future of the built environment for transformative impact in communities worldwide. we are a global network of professionals in every sector of real estate development and land use, from private enterprise to public service.

Environment
9
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
American Geosciences Institute

The american geosciences institute (agi) was founded in 1948, under a directive of the national academy of sciences, as a network of associations representing geoscientists with a diverse array of skills and knowledge of our planet. the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The John Whitehead Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $750,000 · HealthWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEA…MAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $75,000 · HealthMAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INCBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $422,901 · EducationBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INCRAISING EXPECTATIONS INC: $235,000 · EducationRAISING EXPECTATIONS INCMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $100,500 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyIndividual grant recipient: $179,667 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $113,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HO…THE JOHN WHITEHEAD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $103,233 · OtherTHE JOHN WHITEHEAD FAMIL…CORE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherCORE COMMUNITY SCHOOL+3 more: $24,100 · OtherACLU FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $90,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $30,800 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $23,100 · EnvironmentWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $15,300 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUST: $8,300 · InternationalThe Place of Forsyth County Inc: $12,500 · Human ServicesBicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia: $3,900 · Recreation & Sports
Health$825,000Education$758,401Other$495,000Civil Rights$120,000Environment$53,900International$23,600Human Services$12,500Recreation & Sports$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $750,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $422,901 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAISING EXPECTATIONS INC: $235,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetTHE JOHN WHITEHEAD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $103,233 over 2y, 100% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $100,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $90,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $30,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $23,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $15,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Place of Forsyth County Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $8,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia: $3,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Whitehead Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Whitehead Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Mab Community Services Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Whitehead Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Whitehead Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whitehead’s filings →

More from the funding graph