Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wendell and Celia Ellis Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$465k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MEducation$225kHuman Services$81kInternational$12kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$500Recreation & Sports$450Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $440k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$688k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$200,000
LESTER MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
LESTER MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
LESTER MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
LESTER MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
ONEONTA PUBLIC LIBRARY$15,000
BLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $2k → 18%GOD'S GRACE: $42k → 9%GOD'S GARAGE: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 5 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$1.8M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+40%

Still filing today

80%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $206k · revenue +99%
  • GG
    Gods Garage Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $67k · revenue +16%
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services
4
Florida United Methodist Children's Home Inc

Empowering children and families to experience the transforming love of christ through evidence-based care and holistic services

Human Services
5
Church of God Children's Home of North Carolina Inc

To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the north carolina department of social services

Human Services
6
Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc

Texas baptist children's home embraces children and families in need in order to empower and equip them for a promising future.

Human Services
7
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
8
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

—
9
Agape of Central Alabama Inc

As a ministry of jesus christ, agape's mission is that vulnerable and orphaned children find permanency in safe, nurturing families.

Human Services
10
Every Child Ministries

Christian mission offering hope to the forgotten children of africa and training leaders and teachers for african children.

International
11
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
12
African Children's Mission Inc

Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of Christ-Corazon De Cristo Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gods Garage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LESTER MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1,504,291 · OtherLESTER MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+6 more: $22,950 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $206,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVE…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationGods Garage Inc: $67,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesBLOUNT COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $12,000 · Crime & LegalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF CHRIST-CORAZON DE CRISTO INC: $2,000 · International
Other$1,527,241Education$208,000Human Services$69,000Crime & Legal$12,000Religion$10,000Philanthropy$3,000International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $206,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGods Garage Inc: $67,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBLOUNT COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $12,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY PREPARATORY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF CHRIST-CORAZON DE CRISTO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gods Garage Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOUNT COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY PREPARATORY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF CHRIST-CORAZON DE CRISTO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wendell and Celia Ellis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wendell and Celia Ellis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wendell and Celia Ellis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph