Skip to content
The Weiskopf Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Weiskopf Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
91
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$451k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$8.3MFood & Nutrition$350kPhilanthropy$289kEducation$138kHealth$126kInternational$125kHuman Services$114kArts & Culture$87kOther$0
02FY2024 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $123k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $451k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$766k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TORAH U'MESORAH$450,650
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA$160,000
CONGREGATION YESHIVA BAIS HILLEL$150,000
Individual grant recipient$118,000
OTHERS UNDER 2500 PER GRANT$91,438
CONGREGATION OHR TORAH$75,000
AMUDIM$72,000
GEMILOS CHASADIM CHASDEI MOSHE$60,000
Individual grant recipient$56,000
YESHIVA OHR V'DAAS$55,000
KEREN OLAM HATORAH$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
BETH MEDRASH ZICHRON TUVIA$50,000
KOLLEL ZICHRON SHNEUR$39,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $10k → 6%YAD CHAYA: $10k → 13%AFOPEY: $500 → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500 → 11%GEMACH OF JACKSON: $100 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $100 → 11%YAD CHAYA: $1k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $1k → 13%NASI PROJECT: $1k → 13%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $2k → 14%CHAI 4 EVER: $5k → 11%CHAI 4 EVER: $5k → 11%YAD MENACHEM L'TINOK: $1k → 17%ZICHRON MATTEL: $500 → 11%COMMUNITY LEGACY FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%RELIEF RESOURCES: $18k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $18k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $18k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $10k → 20%REFIEF RESOURCES: $10k → 20%A TIME: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $250 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.7M · 160 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

160 repeat relationships: 68 still active in FY2024, 92 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

160
253

Total granted

$9.7M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+8%

Still filing today

24%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $427k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $340k · revenue +31%
  • YO
    YESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $243k · revenue +13%
  • CC
    CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2024 · $236k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF ELKINS PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $180k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AND YESHIVAS BEIS HILLEL
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BAIS HILLEL
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
7
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
8
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
9
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
10
American Friends of Amaleh Shel Torah Inc

None

Education
11
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
12
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Meah Shearim Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Torah Wisdom Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 440 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/94
Grantees still filing
63/94
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TORAH U'MESORAH: $1,414,150 · OtherTORAH U'MESORAHBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $753,001 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHACONGREGATION YESHIVA BAIS HILLEL: $476,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $454,000 · Other+162 more: $7,191,395 · Other+162 moreYESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS: $242,500 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $236,000 · ReligionAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS: $100,000 · ReligionCAMP HASC INC: $36,000 · Religion+9 more: $93,280 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $215,580 · EducationTHE OJC FUND: $103,194 · EducationFriends of Tiferet Tzion Inc: $68,000 · EducationBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL OF DENVER: $60,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS HATORAH: $48,251 · EducationMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $30,000 · EducationTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $23,000 · EducationYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $21,800 · Education+2 more: $29,700 · EducationTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $340,300 · Food & NutritionO A E PINSK KARLIN INC: $82,000 · PhilanthropyGEMACH ZICHRON MAYER RC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $9,000 · PhilanthropyRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $74,000 · Human ServicesYAD CHAYA INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesZICHRON AVROHOM VESTHER FUND: $12,000 · Human ServicesCHAI 4EVER INC: $10,252 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $46,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUR PLACE INC: $7,500 · Youth Development
Other$10,288,546Religion$707,780Education$599,525Food & Nutrition$340,300Philanthropy$141,000Human Services$118,252Youth Development$53,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $340,300 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS: $242,500 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $236,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $215,580 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $103,194 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetO A E PINSK KARLIN INC: $82,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $74,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFriends of Tiferet Tzion Inc: $68,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL OF DENVER: $60,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS HATORAH: $48,251 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $46,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHATZOLOH EMS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $23,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $21,800 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT TIFERE MORDECHAI INC: $19,200 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $18,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKESHER GLOBAL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetZICHRON AVROHOM VESTHER FUND: $12,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMIGDAL OZ INC: $11,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKOLLEL NEZIKIN INC: $11,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,538 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIVOT HORAAH: $10,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $10,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $10,252 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMACHON HARAV SHACH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Bait Shmaya Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetDAF A WEEK INC: $5,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS ↗
  • Who funds CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS ↗
  • Who funds O A E PINSK KARLIN INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF RESOURCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Ojc FundThe Jmg FoundationYr Foundation TrustZichron Chaim Charity…Jewish Community Foun…National Society for …The Sorala FoundationZichron Yechiel Meche…Jewish Communal FundThe Ohr Hakotel Found…Regina Goldwasser Fou…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY89.4× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Yr Foundation Trust · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · The Sorala Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Weiskopf Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Weiskopf Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 290%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
29get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Weiskopf Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Weiskopf Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 440 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weiskopf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home