Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Weishaupt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$132kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kPhilanthropy$62kRecreation & Sports$53kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$38kYouth Development$32kHealth$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRES DOUX FOUNDATION$25,000
HOTEL HOPE$10,000
MORRIS JEFF SCHOOL$10,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$6,000
COOPER UNION$6,000
HANDS ON NEW ORLEANS$5,000
HAGARS HOUSE$5,000
FRIENDS OF BAYOU ST JOHN$5,000
THE 18TH WARD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KREWE OF RED BEANS NOLA MURAL FEST$2,500
ELECTRIC GIRLS$2,500
MINO FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
EDEN HOUSE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%HAGAR HOUSE INC: $5k → 11%ONE HEART NOLA: $5k → 15%EDEN HOUSE: $5k → 23%HANDS ON NEW ORLEANS: $5k → 23%PROPELLER: $5k → 23%PROPELLER: $3k → 23%PROPELLER: $3k → 23%PROPELLER: $5k → 23%OPERATION RESTORATION: $3k → 23%OPERATION RESTORATION: $3k → 23%OPERATION RESTORATION: $3k → 23%OPERATION RESTORATION: $2k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 50% of The Weishaupt Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in LA; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Weishaupt Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$420k · 24 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$420k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

50%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1W
    18TH WARD
    4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue ×46
  • EC
    EDEN CENTERS
    5× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +96%
  • PC
    PONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • LK
    LAGNIAPPE KREWE EMERGENCY RELIEF FU
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • MJ
    MORRIS JEFF COMMUNITY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +30%
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebuilding Together New Orleans

Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.

Philanthropy
2
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
3
New Orleans Police and Justice Foundation Inc

Support of the new orleans police department and orleans parish criminal justice system along with crime prevention activities with the public. nopjf helps the nopd initiate innovative programs that make new orleans a safer place to live,…

Crime & Legal
4
Greater New Orleans Development Foundation

To foster regional economic development and create quality jobs within the metropolitan new orleans area.

Community Improvement
5
Arts Council of New Orleans

The Arts Council of New Orleans dba Arts New Orleans is a private, nonprofit organization with 501(c)(3) status dedicated to supporting arts and culture in the city.

Arts & Culture
6
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified
7
Invest in Louisiana

To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.

Public Benefit
8
The Urban Conservancy

Founded in 2001, The Urban Conservancy is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to research, education and advocacy that promotes the wise stewardship of the urban built environment and local economies.

Community Improvement
9
Court Watch Nola

To monitor criminal cases in the orleans parish court systems to ensure transparency and accountability at every level and to encourage efficiency.

Crime & Legal
10
Network Volunteers

To recruit, connect and manage a network of volunteers and community organizations by identifying impactful volunteer projects and creating tuen-key volunteer experiences.

11
Forward Together New Orleans

People matter. forward together new orleans' mission is to move the city forward in an intentional way, focusing on our people: their goals, needs, and aspirations.

12
Roots of Renewal Nola

Roots of renewal is committed to holistic solutions for the root causes of violence so that forgotten neighborhoods can reach their full potential. the purpose of roots of renewal is to address the educational, economic, and racial…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hands On New Orleans and the most unlike its peers is Turning Tables. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…K-12 Schools and Early Educ…Animal Rescue and WelfareCommunity Environmental Res…Youth Career DevelopmentNew Orleans Music & Cultura…Regional Economic Developme…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAGNIAPPE KREWE EMERGENCY RELIEF FU — $100,000 · OtherLAGNIAPPE KREWE EMERGENCY RELIEF FUCOOPER UNION — $68,000 · OtherCOOPER UNIONMORRIS JEFF SCHOOL — $40,000 · OtherMORRIS JEFF SCHOOLMINO FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherMINO FOUNDATIONAUBURN UNIVERSITY — $18,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INC — $17,500 · OtherELECTRIC GIRLS INC — $17,500 · Other+19 more — $96,500 · Other+19 moreEDEN CENTERS — $20,000 · Human ServicesEDEN CENTE…SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS — $15,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ENT…OPERATION RESTORATION — $9,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION …ONE HEART NOLA INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesONE HEART …HANDS ON NEW ORLEANS — $5,000 · Human ServicesHANDS ON N…THE HAGAR HOUSE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HAGAR …FRIENDS OF BAYOU ST JOHN — $25,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF…TRES DOUX FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTRES DOUX …LONGUE VUE HOUSE & GARDENS — $5,000 · Arts & CultureLONGUE VUE…MORRIS JEFF COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $12,500 · EducationLIBERTY'S KITCHEN INC — $11,500 · EducationOperation Spark — $10,500 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Education18TH WARD — $35,000 · Recreation & SportsPONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY — $18,000 · EnvironmentHOTEL HOPE — $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$387,500Human Services$59,000Arts & Culture$55,000Education$40,500Recreation & Sports$35,000Environment$18,000Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget18TH WARD — $35,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF BAYOU ST JOHN — $25,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTRES DOUX FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEDEN CENTERS — $20,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY — $18,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELECTRIC GIRLS INC — $17,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetHOTEL HOPE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS — $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMORRIS JEFF COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY'S KITCHEN INC — $11,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOperation Spark — $10,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGUE VUE HOUSE & GARDENS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE HEART NOLA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTAKE PAWS RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHANDS ON NEW ORLEANS — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HAGAR HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTurning Tables — $4,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFriends of Lafitte Corridor Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS & RESPONSE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CITY PARK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA HOSPITALITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 18TH WARD
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BAYOU ST JOHN
  • Who funds TRES DOUX FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDEN CENTERS
  • Who funds PONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds ELECTRIC GIRLS INC
  • Who funds HOTEL HOPE
  • Who funds SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS
  • Who funds MORRIS JEFF COMMUNITY SCHOOL
  • Who funds LIBERTY'S KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Operation Spark
  • Who funds OPERATION RESTORATION
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LONGUE VUE HOUSE & GARDENS
  • Who funds ONE HEART NOLA INC
  • Who funds TAKE PAWS RESCUE
  • Who funds HANDS ON NEW ORLEANS
  • Who funds THE HAGAR HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Turning Tables
  • Who funds Friends of Lafitte Corridor Inc
  • Who funds SEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS & RESPONSE CENTER
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CITY PARK
  • Who funds Stay Local

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA37.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Shell USA Company Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · New Orleans Community Support Foundation · Keller Family Foundation · Methodist Health System Foundation Inc · Junior League of New Orleans Inc · The Gpoa Foundation · Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Weishaupt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Weishaupt Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Weishaupt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph