Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Weiner-Ellman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$103kEmployment$31kEducation$14kPhilanthropy$9kReligion$9kHealth$8kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$291k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY$21,561
YOUTH JOB CENTER$12,655
NORTHLIGHT THEATRE$8,793
Individual grant recipient$2,060
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART$1,150
EVANSTON ANIMAL SHELTER$624
CHERRY PRESCHOOL$515
CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN$439
Individual grant recipient$371
IFAWORG$300
ASPCA$300
COMMUNITY PARTNERS AFFORDABLE HOUSING$259
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY$250
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$206
CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $300 → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $500 → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $500 → 14%World Food Program: $100 → 14%Chicago Lighthouse: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$221k · 32 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
54

Total granted

$221k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+69%

Still filing today

59%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +197%
  • YJ
    YOUTH JOB CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +29%
  • WW
    WARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
4
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
8
Farm Sanctuary Inc

We pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living through education and policy advocacy.

Animals
9
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
10
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group; the most unlike its peers is Equity & Empowerment for Evanston Families. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
38/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $103,708 · AnimalsMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INCFelines Inc: $8,150 · AnimalsFelines IncONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $4,133 · Animals+6 more: $6,888 · Animals+6 moreYOUTH JOB CENTER INC: $39,676 · OtherYOUTH JOB CENTER INCWARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOL: $8,845 · OtherWARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $8,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe ARK: $4,202 · OtherTZEDEK CHICAGO: $4,087 · OtherYOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC: $3,700 · Other+78 more: $39,598 · Other+78 moreNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $8,793 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureEvanston Community Foundation: $8,342 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyEVANSTON SCHOLARS: $3,709 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $1,000 · EducationCURT'S CAFE: $4,000 · EmploymentGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Animals$122,879Other$108,218Arts & Culture$9,793Philanthropy$8,442Education$4,709Employment$4,000Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $103,708 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTH JOB CENTER INC: $39,676 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOL: $8,845 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $8,793 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEvanston Community Foundation: $8,342 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFelines Inc: $8,150 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $4,133 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $4,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEVANSTON SCHOLARS: $3,709 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC: $3,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $2,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRECOVERY ON WATER INC: $2,049 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,762 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMotley Zoo Animal Rescue: $532 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUITY & EMPOWERMENT FOR EVANSTON FAMILIES: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSunbird Initiative: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Chicago: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Community Hospital Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBANITE THEATRE INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bay Park Conservancy Inc: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH JOB CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Evanston Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Felines Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP ↗
  • Who funds CURT'S CAFE ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY ON WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Motley Zoo Animal Rescue ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Kellcie Fund · Northwestern University · AbbVie Foundation · Elizabeth Beidler Tisdahl Foundation · Evanston Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Francis Beidler Foundation · Finnegan Family Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Weiner-Ellman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Weiner-Ellman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weiner-Ellman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph