Skip to content
The Webb Family Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Webb Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$427kInternational$80kHealth$75kPhilanthropy$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kHuman Services$39kCommunity Improvement$37kAnimals$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATCAA$20,000
FOOD BANK OF MONTEREY COUNTY$20,000
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$20,000
DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$15,000
PASADENA HUMANE$15,000
903 KAZU$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CARMEL FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%PRUNEDALE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 12%SIERRA SENIOR PROVIDERS: $12k → 14%PRUNEDALE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 12%SIERRA SENIOR PROVIDERS: $10k → 14%CARMEL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%CARMEL FOUNDATION: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Webb Family Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 76%.

The Webb Family Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$508k · 15 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
26

Total granted

$508k
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+114%

Still filing today

60%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentAnimalsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +55%
  • SS
    Sierra Senior Providers Inc
    2× · 2017–2019 · $22k · revenue +52%
  • OF
    OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS
    2× · 2018–2021 · $18k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • WF
    WORLD FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • HISPANIC FEDERATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +213%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
11
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
12
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Rezvan Foundation for Excellence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $146,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTYAMADOR TUOLUMNE COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $94,000 · OtherAMADOR TUOLUMNE COMMUNITY RESOURCESATCAA: $78,000 · OtherATCAAIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWORLD FOOD BANK: $30,000 · Other+27 more: $220,900 · Other+27 moreCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $13,000 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyREZVAN FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $2,500 · PhilanthropyJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $67,500 · Food & NutritionSierra Senior Providers Inc: $22,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesPRUNEDALE SENIOR CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,200 · Human ServicesGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · InternationalHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $13,500 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO INC: $8,160 · Youth DevelopmentCARMEL YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$608,900Philanthropy$72,500Food & Nutrition$67,500Human Services$57,200International$55,000Community Improvement$30,000Youth Development$24,160

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $146,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMADOR TUOLUMNE COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $94,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $67,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Senior Providers Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $17,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORGAN AUTISM CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $8,160 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOSEPHINE KERNES MEMORIAL POOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPRUNEDALE SENIOR CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCARMEL YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetREZVAN FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $2,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Carmel Foundation: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Webb Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Webb Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Webb Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home