Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Chartway Promise Foundation

CHARTWAY PROMISE FOUNDATION to provide medically fragile childen and their families memorable experiences that bring joy, hope and smiles.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$245k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$5.9MHuman Services$141kPhilanthropy$135kFood & Nutrition$28k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $938,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,083,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $145,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $742k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$388k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE-A-WISH UTAH$245,000
MAKE-A-WISH VIRGINIA$175,000
TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION$100,000
HOOKED ON HOPE VB$65,000
FACT$57,000
ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN$50,000
CHKD$50,000
INTERMOUNTAIN PRIMARY CHILDREN'S$30,000
TEAM HOYT HB$21,000
MAKE A WISH - TX$20,000
EASTERSEALS UCP$16,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - INTERMOUNTAIN AREA$15,000
EYE CARE FOR KIDS$15,000
ABILITY FOUND$15,000
CATS HAMPTON ROADS$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TEAM HOYT HB: $21k → 10%TEAM HOYT HB: $10k → 10%ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION: $13k → 10%CATS HAMPTON ROADS: $15k → 19%ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ABILITY FOUND: $15k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $225k → 10%CATS HAMPTON ROADS: $10k → 19%ABILITY FOUND: $10k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $215k → 10%ABILITY FOUND: $10k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $210k → 10%ABILITY FOUND: $15k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%ABILITY FOUND: $10k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%ABILITY FOUND: $13k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%ABILITY FOUND: $10k → 8%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 18 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$6.0M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+10%

Still filing today

89%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +97%
  • TD
    TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +73% · 82% of their budget
  • CH
    Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters
    8× · 2017–2024 · $750k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • MV
    MAKE-A-WISH VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue +10%
  • HU
    HAMPTON UNIV PROTON THERAPY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
3
Gamechanger Charity

Gamechanger leverages technology and innovation to help children and their families who encounter life threatening illnesses.

Health
4
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
5
Children's Hospital Association
Health
6
See the Magic

Focused on enhancing the hospital experience of children and adolescents undergoing treatment at pediatric cancer facilities across the u.s.

Health
7
Montana Hope Project Inc

Granting wishes for montana children living with critical illnesses.

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports
10
Super Heroes With Super Kids
Philanthropy
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kaylees Legocy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%8%<5yr15%27%5–10yr17%23%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr12%23%35–55yr14%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr17%38%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr12%37%35–55yr14%12%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
16%
1,845/11,489

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters — $750,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital of the King's DaughtersROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC — $583,500 · HealthROC SOLID FOUNDATION INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA — $455,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIAHOOKED ON HOPE — $207,500 · HealthHOOKED ON HOPEFAMILIES OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN OF TIDEWATER INC — $131,400 · HealthFAMILIES OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN OF TIDEWATER …INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $83,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC — $80,000 · Health+5 more — $81,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC — $1,672,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INCMAKE-A-WISH VIRGINIA — $100,000 · OtherST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN INC — $90,000 · Other+7 more — $98,800 · OtherTOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION INC — $1,550,000 · Human ServicesTOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION INCABILITY FOUND CORPORATION — $83,000 · Human Services+3 more — $78,500 · Human ServicesSAINT MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $135,000 · PhilanthropyHAMPTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education
Health$2,371,400Other$1,960,800Human Services$1,711,500Philanthropy$135,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC — $1,672,000 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetTOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION INC — $1,550,000 over 8y, 82% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters — $750,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC — $583,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA — $455,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetHOOKED ON HOPE — $207,500 over 6y, 52% of budgetSAINT MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetFAMILIES OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN OF TIDEWATER INC — $131,400 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetABILITY FOUND CORPORATION — $83,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $83,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC — $80,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetEYE CARE FOR KIDS - Utah — $37,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTEAM HOYT VB — $31,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $15,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBest Seat in the House — $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Medical Angels — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPLETE THE PUZZLE LLC — $9,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Langley for Families …Hampton Roads Communi…United Way of South H…Dominion Energy Chari…The Charity Bowl Foot…The Southeast Virgini…Sentara HealthThe McWaters Family F…Network for GoodCharities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…
Langley for Families - the Foundation of LfcuVA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · Hampton Roads Community Foundation · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Charity Bowl Football Game · The Southeast Virginia Community Foundation · Sentara Health · The McWaters Family Foundation · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chartway Promise Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines