Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wattis Dumke Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$495k
Granted FY2019
22
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$77k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of The Wattis Dumke Foundation Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund For Wealth Management Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Wattis Dumke Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $495k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
17
10
18
13
19
8
20
0
21
0
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$9.2MEducation$690kHealth$334kHuman Services$289kRecreation & Sports$190kArts & Culture$60kEnvironment$55kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2019 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $258k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $227k
$16,666
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN DIEGO FRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL$76,667
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
BLAINE COUNTY RECREATION DISTRICT$50,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$50,000
WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA$25,000
PARARESCUE FOUNDATION$25,000
HOSPICE OF THE WOOD RIVER$21,667
FOUND FOR INDIV RIGHTS IN EDUC$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ORTHOPEDICS$20,000
JOHN C MORAN EYE CENTER$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH VETERAN STUDIES$16,666
PEREGRINE FUND$15,000
SAGE SCHOOL INCORPORATED$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
HIGHER GROUND$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARARESCUE FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%PARARESCUE FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%PARARESCUE FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%BLAINE COUNTY SENIOR COUNCIL: $30k → 7%PARARESCUE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%SWIFTSURE RANCH: $8k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $35k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MI
NY
PA
CA
UT
VA
MD
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 17 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+21%

Still filing today

53%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO FRENCH-AMERICAN SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $356k · revenue +49%
  • PF
    PARARESCUE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +214% · 25% of their budget
  • TS
    THE SAGE SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $78k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • WO
    Word of Honor Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +21%
  • AS
    ANIMAL SHELTER OF THE WR VALLEY
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • BC
    BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +200%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
2
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
3
Summerfield Waldorf School and Farm

Provide quality education for grades kindergarten through high school,as well as providing auxiliary educational programs to the students to strengthen their overall learning experience.

Education
4
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

5
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
Ussa Investment Fund

Operates exclusively to manage the investment of endowment gifts made for the benefit of supporting the development, training, and competition of elite national, international, and development athletes in skiing and snowboarding.

Recreation & Sports
8
Gould Academy

Gould academy guides students to be creative, courageous and resilient and to lead lives of fulfillment and purpose.

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

11
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
12
The Stronghold Fund

The wild salmon center (wsc) has created the stronghold fund to provide long-term financial support to wsc and its partners for efforts in key watersheds throughout the north pacific.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sun Valley Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Animal Rescue and AdoptionPublic Library SupportSenior Support ServicesVolunteer Fire DepartmentsYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsCommunity Health CentersVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%91%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $3,067,524 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INCDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,991,703 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+2 more — $160,000 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GIFT FUND — $2,857,812 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GIFT FUNDSAN DIEGO FRENCH-AMERICAN SCHOOL — $356,192 · OtherSAN DIEGO FRENCH-AMERICAN SCHOOLMORGAN STANLEY GIFT — $166,000 · Other+17 more — $723,125 · Other+17 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $94,441 · EducationTHE SAGE SCHOOL INC — $77,500 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationThe Community Library Association Inc — $10,000 · EducationPARARESCUE FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesWord of Honor Fund — $35,000 · Human ServicesBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION — $29,525 · Human ServicesFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $24,609 · HealthHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsBOULDER MOUNTAIN TOUR LTD — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $60,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$6,219,227Other$4,103,129Education$231,941Human Services$182,025Health$99,609Recreation & Sports$75,000Arts & Culture$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $3,067,524 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,991,703 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO FRENCH-AMERICAN SCHOOL — $356,192 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARARESCUE FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $94,441 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAGE SCHOOL INC — $77,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWord of Honor Fund — $35,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetSUN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT — $30,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION — $29,525 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAWTOOTH BOTANICAL GARDEN — $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $24,609 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOULDER MOUNTAIN TOUR LTD — $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetThe Community Library Association Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boswell Family FoundationID20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boswell Family Foundation · Spur Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Nalen Foundation · The Pesky Family Foundation Inc · Nicholas Martin Jr Family Foundation · Kemmerer Family Foundation · Nancy Eccles and Homer M Hayward Family Foundation · Heinz Family Foundation · The Springcreek Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Orange County Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wattis Dumke Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wattis Dumke Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Wattis Dumke Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph