Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wanda Bobowski Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$450kAnimals$316kHealth$300kScience & Tech$275kInternational$205kEducation$145kArts & Culture$80kCivil Rights$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Doctors Without Borders$65,000
The Palestine Children's Relief Fun$25,000
The Amazon Conservation Team$25,000
The Jane Goodall Institute$25,000
International Committee of the Red$25,000
Science Spirit Institute$20,000
YWCA$10,000
The Lawyering Project co Tides Cent$10,000
American Civil Liberties Union$10,000
Mayo Clinic$5,000
National Women's Law Center$5,000
KQED$5,000
KALW$5,000
Wikimedia Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Foundation for Mind-Being Research: $10k → 8%Wikimedia Foundation: $10k → 10%Global Institute for Tibetan Medici: $100k → 11%The Palestine Children's Relief Fun: $25k → 14%YWCA: $10k → 14%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%Science Spirit Institute: $25k → 7%The Jane Goodall Institute: $111k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $150k → 7%The Lawyering Project co Tides Cent: $10k → 10%Global Institute for Tibetan Medici: $100k → 11%The Palestine Children's Relief Fun: $10k → 14%Carter Burden Network Inc: $10k → 17%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%Science Spirit Institute: $20k → 7%The Jane Goodall Institute: $60k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $110k → 7%Institute for Frontier Science: $50k → 10%Global Institute for Tibetan Medici: $50k → 11%Doctors Without Borders: $65k → 17%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%The Jane Goodall Institute: $25k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $35k → 7%Institute for Frontier Science: $50k → 10%Global Institute for Tibetan Medici: $25k → 11%Doctors Without Borders: $20k → 17%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%The Jane Goodall Institute: $25k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $25k → 7%Institute for Frontier Science: $50k → 10%Global Institute for Tibetan Medici: $20k → 11%Doctors Without Borders: $10k → 17%Greenpeace: $10k → 14%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%The Jane Goodall Institute: $25k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $25k → 7%Institute for Frontier Science: $50k → 10%Doctors Without Borders: $10k → 17%Greenpeace: $10k → 14%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%The Jane Goodall Institute: $20k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $25k → 7%Institute for Frontier Science: $20k → 10%Greenpeace: $10k → 14%Macomb Community College: $10k → 10%The Jane Goodall Institute: $20k → 6%The Amazon Conservation Team: $20k → 7%Institute for Frontier Science: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 19 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+60%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalScience & TechAnimalsSocial ScienceEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $390k · revenue +449%
  • JG
    JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $286k · revenue +50%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CB
    CARTER BURDEN NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR MIND BEING RESEARCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
4
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
7
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Frontier Science. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Global Institute for Tibetan Medici: $295,000 · OtherGlobal Institute for Tibetan MediciMacomb Community College: $70,000 · OtherMacomb Community CollegeGREENPEACE INC: $60,000 · OtherGREENPEACE INCScience Spirit Institute: $45,000 · OtherScience Spirit InstituteKALW: $40,000 · OtherKALWInternational Committee of the Red: $35,000 · OtherPETA: $30,000 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties Union: $30,000 · Other+7 more: $80,000 · Other+7 moreAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $390,000 · Science & TechAMAZON CONSERVATION TEA…JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $286,061 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INST…INSTITUTE FOR FRONTIER SCIENCE: $230,000 · Social ScienceINSTITUTE FOR…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $35,000 · InternationalPALESTINE …AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalAMNESTY IN…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · EducationKQED INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$685,000Science & Tech$390,000Animals$286,061Social Science$230,000International$170,000Education$65,000Arts & Culture$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $390,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $286,061 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FRONTIER SCIENCE: $230,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIFWHENHOW: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FRONTIER SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds CARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds IFWHENHOW ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wanda Bobowski Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wanda Bobowski Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wanda Bobowski’s filings →

    More from the funding graph