Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wallace Family Foundation Co Richard C Wallace

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of THE WALLACE FAMILY FOUNDATION CO RICHARD C WALLACE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$3,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWER SCHOOL$65,000
CAMP DUDLEY YMCA$22,650
ocean reef cultural center$11,200
NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY$10,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI$10,000
Preservation Society of Newport Cou$5,000
MERRY MIXERS - SALEM HOSPITAL$5,000
Star Kids Scholarship PROGRAM$3,500
MILL REEF FUND$2,000
International Tennis Hall of Fame I$2,000
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$1,000
RON FOLEY FOUNDATION$1,000
ROSE ISLAND LIGHTHOUSE FUND$1,000
HOLDERNESS SCHOOL$1,000
FLORIDA KEYS CHILDRENS SHELTER INC$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FLORIDA KEYS CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $600 → 13%THE KEYS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$722k · 19 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$722k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+11%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +16%
  • TP
    THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +86%
  • NR
    NEWPORTFALL RIVER STAR KIDS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +250%

Funded once

  • YR
    YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -7%
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF ART LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -25%
  • S
    Scribble
    one grant, 2024 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
4
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
5
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
8
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
9
Newport Restoration Foundation

Nrf promotes and invests in the heritage of the newport community, the traditional building trades, and doris duke's fine and decorative arts and collections, for the enjoyment, education and inspiration to all.

10
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
11
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
12
Reef Environmental Education Foundation

Reef environmental education foundation (reef) was established as a nonprofit organization in 1990. reef conserves marine environments worldwide. our mission is to protect biodiversity and ocean life by actively engaging and inspiring the…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Preservation Society of Newport County and the most unlike its peers is Scribble. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsYmca Community Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%50%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
8%
2/25
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMP DUDLEY INC — $223,615 · OtherCAMP DUDLEY INCTOWER SCHOOL — $140,000 · OtherTOWER SCHOOLOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $99,760 · OtherOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INCSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI — $50,000 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI+22 more — $42,876 · Other+22 moreOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC — $66,244 · Arts & CultureOCEAN REEF CULT…THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY — $36,350 · Arts & CultureTHE PRESERVATIO…+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureNEWPORTFALL RIVER STAR KIDS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM — $26,000 · EducationHOLDERNESS SCHOOL — $6,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $3,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $22,100 · Environment+1 more — $400 · EnvironmentTHE NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY TRUST — $14,500 · AnimalsYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED — $9,050 · Recreation & Sports
Other$556,251Arts & Culture$103,594Education$36,000Environment$22,500Animals$14,500Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$9,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP DUDLEY INC — $223,615 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $99,760 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC — $66,244 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY — $36,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEWPORTFALL RIVER STAR KIDS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM — $26,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $22,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY TRUST — $14,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED — $9,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLDERNESS SCHOOL — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRon Foley Foundation Inc — $4,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetOCEAN REEF ART LEAGUE INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetScribble — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA KEYS CHILDRENS SHELTER INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLamoille Home Health Agency Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEHOPE FOUNDATION — $476 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP DUDLEY INC
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY
  • Who funds NEWPORTFALL RIVER STAR KIDS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC
  • Who funds THE NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY TRUST
  • Who funds YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED
  • Who funds HOLDERNESS SCHOOL
  • Who funds Ron Foley Foundation Inc
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF ART LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds Scribble
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds ROSE ISLAND LIGHTHOUSE AND FORT HAMILTON TRUST INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA KEYS CHILDRENS SHELTER INC
  • Who funds KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Lamoille Home Health Agency Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ONEHOPE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · The John H and Katherine J Weiland Foundation Inc · The Hajim Family Foundation · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · Kitchings Family Foundation · Alben F & Clara G Bates Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wallace Family Foundation Co Richard C Wallace funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc26% of income from government
  • Florida Keys Childrens Shelter Inc19% of income from government
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wallace Family Foundation Co Richard C Wallace?

Find your warmest path to The Wallace Family Foundation Co Richard C Wallace through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph