Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Waldorf Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$168kHousing & Shelter$127kReligion$92kEducation$80kPhilanthropy$30kInternational$25kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$791k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK FOUNDLING$50,000
MOMMAS HOUSE$3,000
SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC$2,005
COVENANT HOUSE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $272k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEW GROUND INC: $10k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $30k → 14%NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $50k → 17%NEW GROUND INC: $5k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 14%NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $30k → 17%NEW GROUND INC: $5k → 6%New York Foundling: $25k → 17%New York Foundling: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 14%NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%New York Foundling: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 6 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
14

Total granted

$414k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

83%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK FOUNDLING
    7× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +82%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +34%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • LF
    LSA FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CM
    CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -31%
  • MS
    Maryknoll Sisters
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
2
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
5
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
6
New York Congregational Community Services
Health
7
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
8
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
9
Nontraditional Employment for Women

See schedule onontraditional employment for women (new) prepares, trains, and places women in careers in the skilled construction, utility, and maintenance trades, helping women achieve economic independence and a secure future.

Employment
10
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
11
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling; the most unlike its peers is New York Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $145,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK FOUNDLINGCOVENANT HOUSE: $107,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSENew Ground Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesNew Ground IncSisters of St Dominic: $52,005 · OtherSisters of St DominicNEW YORK FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDATIONLSA FAMILY SERVICES: $15,000 · OtherLSA FAMILY SERVICESMaryknoll Sisters: $10,000 · OtherMaryknoll SistersSISTERS OF THE DOMINICAN: $10,000 · OtherSISTERS OF THE DOMINICANMarymount College: $10,000 · OtherMarymount CollegeDC: $10,000 · OtherDCSISTERS OF ST DOMINIC: $10,000 · OtherSISTERS OF ST DOMINICSisters of Charity of New York: $10,000 · OtherSisters of Charity of New York+4 more: $16,000 · Other+4 moreST FRANCIS COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationST FRANCIS COL…MOLLOY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationMOLLOY UNIVERS…CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $15,000 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 · InternationalSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$272,000Other$173,005Education$70,000International$25,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $107,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS COLLEGE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNew Ground Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOLLOY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Ground Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds MOLLOY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds St Johns Bread & Life Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Waldorf Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Waldorf Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Waldorf Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph