Skip to content

· Private foundation

The W W Sun Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$48kReligion$36kArts & Culture$11kFood & Nutrition$10kInternational$6kPhilanthropy$5kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,050
Median grant
2
States reached
$419k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Peninsula Education Foundation$5,000
MAD Foundation Inc$5,000
Glory Lutheran Church$4,050
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hope in a Suitcase: $1k → 14%Hope in a Suitcase: $1k → 14%Hope in a Suitcase: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 11 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$106k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+245%

Still filing today

55%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PALOS VERDES PENINSULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +6%
  • TM
    THE MAD FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2018–2020 · $6k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • PE
    PVP Education Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CC
    CCCSB Chinese Community Church of S
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • N
    NYUEdu
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation to Support Education Worldwide
Philanthropy
2
Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundationinc

Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundation, Inc. ("FFOF") was established by five alumni from Fudan Fuzhong, the high school affiliated with Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Fudan University is one of the leading institutes of higher education…

Education
3
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
4
Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International
5
Her Next Steps
Human Services
6
Opportunity Fund for Developing Countries

Empower Women, Educate Children, Enhance Health for All

—
7
Peruvian Hearts

Peruvian Hearts works to end poverty and gender inequality by educating girls and creating women leaders in Peru. We enable young women to embrace education and to believe in their own power and abilities to dream and create a better life…

Youth Development
8
Zhiyuan Yining Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Vidya Girls Education Foundation
Education
10
She-Can Global Inc

The world is grappling with complex problems, including climate change, war, poverty, and ongoing human rights violations. These issues disproportionately impact women, particularly in developing countries. In nations recovering from…

Education
11
Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation

Asian university for women (auw) seeks to offer high quality education to young women of extraordinary talents drawn from diverse national, ethnic, religious, and socio-economic backgrounds. see schedule o for continuation.it is open to…

Education
12
De Shema Inc

Our mission is to support women and girls across rural communities in ganzi and beyond by providing educational opportunities and improving access to quality of healthcare. we strive to strengthen their leadership capacity through…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empowher Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINESE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SOUTH BAY: $15,000 · OtherCHINESE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SOUTH BAYGLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12,600 · OtherGLORY LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPVP Education Foundation: $5,000 · OtherPVP Education FoundationCCCSB Chinese Community Church of S: $4,500 · OtherCCCSB Chinese Community Church of STHE ZIGEN FUND INC: $4,000 · OtherTHE ZIGEN FUND INCIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNYUEdu: $3,000 · Other+7 more: $8,525 · Other+7 morePALOS VERDES PENINSULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationPALOS VERDES PENINSULA EDUCATION FOUNDATIONTHE MAD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE MAD FOUNDATION INCNew York University: $6,000 · EducationNew York University+1 more: $1,000 · EducationPALOS VERDES JUNIOR WOMEN'S CLUB: $5,025 · PhilanthropyHOPE IN A SUITCASE: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$65,625Education$52,000Philanthropy$5,025Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPALOS VERDES PENINSULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNew York University: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALOS VERDES JUNIOR WOMEN'S CLUB: $5,025 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ZIGEN FUND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE IN A SUITCASE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBEACON OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetEMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALOS VERDES PENINSULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds PALOS VERDES JUNIOR WOMEN'S CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE ZIGEN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IN A SUITCASE ↗
  • Who funds BEACON OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The W W Sun Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The W W Sun Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The W W Sun Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The W W Sun Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W W Sun Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph