Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The W Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$41kPhilanthropy$34kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$18kEducation$16kHousing & Shelter$15kCivil Rights$11kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$231k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sun Valley Music Festival$6,000
Mary's Place$5,000
Pike Place Market Foundation$5,000
Jewish Federation$3,500
KUOW$2,500
St Louis Food Bank$2,000
Northwest Harvest$2,000
Make A Wish$1,000
Seattle Times Fund For The Needy$1,000
Salvation Army$1,000
Union Gospel Mission$1,000
National Air and Space$1,000
Seattle Public Library$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Jewish Family Service: $1k → 9%Sound Generations: $1k → 9%Bread of Life Mission: $500 → 9%University District Food Bank: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$98k · 13 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +81% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
34

Total granted

$98k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+81%

Still filing today

69%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +68%
  • DE
    Downtown Emergency Service Center
    3× · 2018–2020 · $14k · revenue +132%
  • HC
    Holocaust Center For Humanity
    5× · 2018–2022 · $9k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • WR
    Wood River YMCA Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION (#2814#2829)
    one grant, 2017 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
2
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
3
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
4
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
5
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
6
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
7
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

8
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
9
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
10
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
11
Portland Farmers Market

Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…

Community Improvement
12
Spokane Parks Foundation

The Spokane Parks Foundation cultivates the health, growth, and continued enjoyment of our communities by inspiring giving and passion for our parks.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Harvest Emm and the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Access & Community Res…Community Foundations & Gra…International Development &…Education Equity & AccessSocial Justice Legal Servic…Immigrant & Refugee Communi…Affordable Housing & Suppor…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr19%35%20–35yr12%48%35–55yr12%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr19%30%20–35yr12%60%35–55yr12%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
14%
1,719/12,714

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Jewish Federation — $20,550 · OtherJewish FederationNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $9,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMHolocaust Center For Humanity — $8,500 · OtherHolocaust Center For HumanityNORTH SEATTLE COLLEGE — $6,269 · OtherNORTH SEATTLE COLLEGEWood River YMCA Foundation — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION (#2814#2829) — $4,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER (#2824) — $4,000 · Other+37 more — $38,542 · Other+37 moreSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $18,000 · Arts & CultureSUN VALLEY SU…KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $2,500 · Arts & CultureKUOW PUGET SO…Downtown Emergency Service Center — $13,500 · HealthALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Community ImprovementPIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Community ImprovementWASHINGTON WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $7,500 · PhilanthropyTHE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND — $2,000 · PhilanthropyMaris Place — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA LATINA — $3,000 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARS — $2,000 · Education
Other$105,261Arts & Culture$20,500Health$13,500Community Improvement$12,500Philanthropy$9,500Youth Development$5,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Emergency Service Center — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity — $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMaris Place — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA LATINA — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $2,325 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPilgrim Africa — $1,217 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND GENERATIONS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE MISSION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA27.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Gates Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Peach Foundation · Brant Foundation · Real Progress Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The W Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph