Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Vonderhaar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$319k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$407kEducation$381kHuman Services$176kFood & Nutrition$157kHealth$149kRecreation & Sports$123kHousing & Shelter$48kInternational$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $134k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Joan of Arc Foundation$150,000
Our Lady of Lourdes Church$34,000
University of Iowa NICU$30,000
First Tee of the Quad Cities$20,000
Food for the Poor$20,000
Childrens Therapy Center$10,000
Quad Cities Golf Charitable Classic$10,000
Riverbend Food Bank$10,000
QC Veterans Outreach$5,000
Hope at the Brick House$5,000
Seton Catholic School$5,000
Assumption High School$5,000
Safe Families for Children$3,000
Tunnel To Towers$2,000
Unbound$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Unbound: $5k → 16%Unbound: $3k → 16%Unbound: $2k → 16%Unbound: $2k → 16%Unbound: $2k → 16%Unbound: $2k → 16%Cafe on Vine: $5k → 12%Cafe on Vine: $2k → 12%Cafe on Vine: $2k → 12%Safe Families for Children: $5k → 15%Safe Families for Children: $3k → 15%Safe Families for Children: $3k → 15%Safe Families for Children: $3k → 15%Safe Families for Children: $3k → 15%Scott County Family Y: $2k → 12%Scott County Family Y: $2k → 12%Scott County Family Y: $2k → 12%Scott County Family Y: $2k → 12%Scott County Family Y: $2k → 12%Scott County Family Y: $1k → 12%Hope at the Brick House: $8k → 12%Hope at the Brick House: $5k → 12%Hope at the Brick House: $5k → 12%Hope at the Brick House: $5k → 12%Hope at the Brick House: $5k → 12%Hope at the Brick House: $3k → 12%Hand-In-Hand: $5k → 12%Womens Choice Center: $5k → 12%Womens Choice Center: $5k → 12%Womens Choice Center: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 35 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+63%

Still filing today

49%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QC
    QUAD CITIES LIFE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT
    3× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +105%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +20%
  • HA
    HOPE AT THE BRICK HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • FR
    FAMILY RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue -1%
  • SC
    SCOTT COUNTY HOUSING COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • HI
    HAND IN HANDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +162%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Services for EVERY1 Inc

We partner with individuals of all abilities to reach their fullest potential, protecting their rights and promoting their independence and inclusion in our community.

Human Services
2
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
3
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
4
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
5
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
6
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
7
Family Care Center of Catawba Valley Inc

The organization serves homeless families with dependent children through an emergency and transitional residential program. the center offers physical, emotional, social and educational services to assist families in the transition to…

Human Services
8
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
9
Community Action of Southeast Iowa

The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…

—
10
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of Central Iowa Inc

Habitat for humanity of central iowa, inc. works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building houses, so that there are decent houses in decent…

—
12
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Resources Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center for Active Seniors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Joan of Arc Catholic School: $300,000 · OtherSt Joan of Arc Catholic SchoolOur Lady of Lourdes Church: $154,500 · OtherOur Lady of Lourdes ChurchST JOAN OF ARC FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherST JOAN OF ARC FOUNDATIONOUR LADY OF LOURDES CATHOLIC CHURCH OF BETTENDORF IOWA: $65,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES CATHOLIC CHURCH OF BETTENDORF IOWAQuad cities Golf Classic Charitable: $50,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP: $50,000 · Other+33 more: $362,000 · Other+33 moreHOPE AT THE BRICK HOUSE INC: $30,500 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $17,000 · Human ServicesUnbound: $16,000 · Human ServicesLIFE & FAMILY EDUCATIONAL TRUST: $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE IOWA MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: $11,000 · Human ServicesCAFE ON VINE: $9,000 · Human ServicesHAND IN HAND: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $102,625 · InternationalEMPOWERING ABILITIES: $25,000 · HealthGENESIS HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthKAHL HOME FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM: $8,500 · HealthQUAD CITIES LIFE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $45,000 · Food & NutritionHUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterSCOTT COUNTY HOUSING COUNCIL: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,131,500Human Services$103,500International$102,625Health$53,500Recreation & Sports$50,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Housing & Shelter$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $102,625 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetQUAD CITIES LIFE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP: $50,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE AT THE BRICK HOUSE INC: $30,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetEMPOWERING ABILITIES: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE OF DAVENPORT IOWA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGENESIS HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $17,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUnbound: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE & FAMILY EDUCATIONAL TRUST: $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE IOWA MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE ON VINE: $9,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetKAHL HOME FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Active Seniors Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHAND IN HAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED OF THE QUAD CITY AREA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds QUAD CITIES LIFE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AT THE BRICK HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERING ABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY HOUSE OF DAVENPORT IOWA ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds LIFE & FAMILY EDUCATIONAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE IOWA MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT COUNTY HOUSING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CAFE ON VINE ↗
  • Who funds KAHL HOME FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM ↗
  • Who funds Center for Active Seniors Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
  • Who funds QUAD CITY VETERANS OUTREACH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Quad Cities Community FoundationIA42.4× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Quad Cities Community Foundation · Scott County Regional Authority · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · United Way Quad Cities · Doris & Victor Day Foundation Inc · Modern Woodmen of America · Hubbell-Waterman Fndn · Baird Foundation Inc · Weigle Family Foundation · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Moline Foundation · American Water Charitable Foundationinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Vonderhaar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Vonderhaar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Vonderhaar Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Vonderhaar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vonderhaar Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph