Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Virginia and Robert Gill Charitable and Educational Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2018
15
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Community Improvement$20kHuman Services$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kReligion$11kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$4kEducation$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k14 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$758k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EDGE CONNECTION$10,000
THE AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
MAYO CLINIC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPME$5,000
SEMPER K9$2,500
UNITED WAY OF ST JOHNS COUNTY$1,750
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN$1,500
VICARS LANDING EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP$1,500
HOPE FOR THE WARRIORS$1,000
BRUNSWICK FAMILY ASSISTANCE$1,000
RIVERSIDE TRADITION HOUSE$600
K9S FOR WARRIORS$526
JACKSONVILLE BEACH LIFEGUARD FOUNDA$500
COASTLINE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD$500
ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 8%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 8%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 13 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$53k
$12k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementAnimalsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +46%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ST JOHNS COUNTY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +43%
  • BF
    Brunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • PP
    PALMS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • US
    UNITED SERVICE ORGAIZTIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Warriors of Mississippi

Wounded Warriors of Mississippi provides support to post-9/11 veterans by addressing critical needs related to housing, financial hardship, and overall well-being. The organization assists veterans through home repairs such as roof repair,…

Health
2
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
3
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
4
Walking With Warriors Ministry Inc

charitable

Religion
5
Frontline Strong

Therapy services for frontline workers such as military, police officers and fire fighters. Free mental heath services.

—
6
Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation
Health
7
Veteran Resilience Project Inc

We inspire lifelong change for Minnesota Veterans, Service Members and Spouses experiencing Trauma and PTS(D), by creating access to effective therapy as a pathway to heal.

Health
8
Heartbeat Serving Wounded Warriors

To provide emergency assistance, morale building and innovative therapeutic services for Wounded Warriors and their families.

—
9
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
10
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
11
Blue Waters Dog Rescue

We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping animals in need. Our focus is on rescuing and rehabilitating animals. We provide the full curriculum of care for each dog rescued, This includes: shelter, food, spaying & neutering,…

Animals
12
Operation Rally Point

To provide immediate access to lodging and triage veterans in crisis for additional services

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Johns County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Edge Connection Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PALMS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10,742 · OtherPALMS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUNITED WAY OF ST JOHNS COUNTY INC: $3,250 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ST JOHNS COUNTY INCVICARS LANDING EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP: $3,000 · OtherVICARS LANDING EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIPSEMPER K9: $3,000 · OtherSEMPER K9SALVATION ARMY: $3,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYBrunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc: $2,000 · OtherBrunswick Family Assistance Agency IncUNITED SERVICE ORGAIZTIONS INC: $1,500 · OtherRiverside Tradition House Inc: $1,100 · OtherCOASTLINE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD I: $1,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE BEACH LIFEGUARD FOUNDA: $1,000 · OtherTHE EDGE CONNECTION INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE EDGE CONNECTION INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National R…WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesWIDE HORIZONS FOR C…MAYO CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,526 · AnimalsHope For The Warriors: $1,000 · PhilanthropyST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$29,592Community Improvement$20,000Human Services$13,000Health$10,000Animals$1,526Philanthropy$1,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EDGE CONNECTION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOHNS COUNTY INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,526 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOASTLINE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD I: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Virginia and Robert Gill Charitable and Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Virginia and Robert Gill Charitable and Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • United Way of St Johns County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Virginia and Robert Gill Charitable and Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph