Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Violet H Greco Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$238k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$540kHuman Services$466kFood & Nutrition$295kHousing & Shelter$219kYouth Development$160kEducation$34kMembership Benefit$20kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $235k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENIEVE SHELTER$30,000
WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC$27,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SUFFOLK MEALS ON WHEELS$25,000
FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VA$20,000
CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT$20,000
EDMARC HOSPICE FOR CHILDREN$15,000
HER SHELTER - PORTSMOUTH$15,000
FORKIDS INC$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
HEALTHY PEOPLE HEALTHY SUFFOLK$10,000
MERCY DROPS DREAMS CENTER$10,000
ST MARYS CHILDRENS HOME$10,000
THE SUFFOLK LITERACY COUNCIL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $50k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $20k → 19%HER SHELTER - PORTSMOUTH: $15k → 20%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $32k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $20k → 19%HER SHELTER - PORTSMOUTH: $15k → 20%GENIEVE SHELTER: $30k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $20k → 19%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $28k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $15k → 19%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $28k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $15k → 19%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $25k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $15k → 19%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $25k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $15k → 19%SUFFOLK MEALS ON WHEELS: $25k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $15k → 19%GENIEVE SHELTER: $25k → 12%FORKIDS INC: $30k → 19%EDMARC HOSPICE FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 20%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $25k → 12%FORKIDS INC: $15k → 19%EDMARC HOSPICE FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 20%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $25k → 12%FORKIDS INC: $15k → 19%EDMARC HOSPICE FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 20%GENIEVE SHELTER: $25k → 12%FORKIDS INC: $15k → 19%EDMARC HOSPICE FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 20%GENIEVE SHELTER: $20k → 12%FORKIDS INC: $15k → 19%EDMARC HOSPICE FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 20%WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC: $20k → 12%GENIEVE SHELTER: $20k → 12%GENIEVE SHELTER: $20k → 12%GENIEVE SHELTER: $20k → 12%SUFFOLK MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 12%GENIEVE SHELTER: $20k → 12%GENIEVE SHELTER: $20k → 12%FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VA: $20k → 19%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER - SUFFOLK: $19k → 12%FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VA: $20k → 19%EMILY GREEN SHORES: $25k → 20%EMILY GREEN SHORES: $25k → 20%EMILY GREEN SHORES: $18k → 20%ST MARYS CHILDRENS HOME: $25k → 19%ST MARYS CHILDRENS HOME: $18k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 20 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+91%

Still filing today

35%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GENIEVE SHELTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +137%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF SUFFOLK & ISLE OF WIGHT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +13%
  • FO
    FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY CORP OF SUFFOLK
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AC
    ACCESS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +48%
  • WB
    WESTERN BRANCH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
2
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

—
3
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
4
Transitions Family Violence Services

The mission of transitions family violence services (tfvs) is to build safe and healthy families on the virginia peninsula by providing services to adult and child victims of domestic violence and human trafficking. we work to increase…

—
5
Food for Others Inc

Food for others provides free groceries to community members experiencing food insecurity in northern virginia. food for others also partners with other nonprofits and community-based organizations to distribute food.

Human Services
6
For Children's Sake of Virginia Inc

For children's sake is dedicated to promoting positive environments for children and families that develop trust, stability and independence.

Human Services
7
East Hampton Meals On Wheels Inc

Delivery of nutritious meals to the homebound, handicapped, elderly and convalescent residents of east hampton town who are unable to provide adequate meals for themselves.

—
8
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
9
Access Partnership

Access partnership facilitates the connection between those with health care needs and available resources. vision is that all residents of hampton roads can obtain the health care that they need to achieve personal wellness. focus is…

—
10
Southside Center for Violence Prevention

Scvp is a non-profit organization providing free, confidential, comprehensive, and trauma-informed services to those affected by sexual and domestic violence. the purpose of scvp is to empower those affected by sexual and domestic violence…

—
11
Arlington Food Assistance Center

To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Southeast Virginia; the most unlike its peers is Western Tidewater Free Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GENIEVE SHELTER: $200,000 · OtherTHE GENIEVE SHELTERMEALS ON WHEELS OF SUFFOLK & ISLE OF WIGHT INC: $150,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF SUFFOLK & ISLE OF WIGHT INCCHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHT: $135,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSP OF THE KINGS DAUGHTST MARYS CHILDRENS HOME: $118,740 · OtherST MARYS CHILDRENS HOMEHEALTHY PEOPLE HEALTHY SUFFOLK: $90,000 · OtherHEALTHY PEOPLE HEALTHY SUFFOLKHER SHELTER - PORTSMOUTH: $90,000 · OtherHER SHELTER - PORTSMOUTHIndividual grant recipient: $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER - SUFFOLK: $59,000 · OtherGRAZN' ACRES THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $52,000 · OtherSENIOR SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST VIRGIN: $40,000 · Other+10 more: $166,000 · Other+10 moreWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC: $257,500 · HealthWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE …EDMARC INC: $125,000 · HealthEDMARC INCFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $145,000 · Food & NutritionFORKIDS INC: $129,000 · Housing & ShelterACCESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education
Other$1,168,740Health$382,500Food & Nutrition$145,000Housing & Shelter$129,000Education$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC: $257,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GENIEVE SHELTER: $200,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SUFFOLK & ISLE OF WIGHT INC: $150,000 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $145,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFORKIDS INC: $129,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEDMARC INC: $125,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Southeast Virginia: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetACCESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GENIEVE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SUFFOLK & ISLE OF WIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds EDMARC INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Southeast Virginia ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Obici Healthcare Foundation IncVA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Obici Healthcare Foundation Inc · The Pruden Foundation · Birdsong Charitable Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Richard Bennett Trust · Suffolk Foundation · Ruth Camp and Henry Campbell Fdn · Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · Townebank Foundation · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Hampton Roads Community Foundation · Sentara Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Violet H Greco Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Violet H Greco Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Violet H Greco’s filings →

    More from the funding graph