Skip to content
The Village Club Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Village Club Foundation

The purpose of THE VILLAGE CLUB FOUNDATION is to further educational, cultural, and civic activities, to promote philanthropic projects, and to operate for the good of the community.

$268k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$260kHealth$229kFood & Nutrition$165kHousing & Shelter$118kEducation$85kYouth Development$58kCrime & Legal$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $81,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $268,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $186,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN$10,000
ACCENT PONTIAC INC$8,000
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$8,000
FAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS$8,000
ST ANNES MEAD$8,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$7,500
CARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC$7,500
METROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$6,500
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - DETROIT$6,500
TROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL$6,000
HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $8k → 21%CAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $13k → 8%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $12k → 21%CAMP CASEY: $8k → 8%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 21%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $8k → 21%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $8k → 21%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $7k → 21%TEAM GUTS INC: $11k → 8%TEAM GUTS INC: $5k → 8%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $8k → 8%OPEN HANDS FOOD PANTRY: $35k → 8%OPEN HANDS FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 8%Ladies of Charity of St Vincent de Paul Oakland County Association: $7k → 8%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $8k → 8%Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation: $7k → 8%OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$838k · 30 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$838k
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+16%

Still filing today

80%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PINK FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $47k · revenue +58%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +119%
  • TF
    THE FURNITURE RESOURCE CENTER
    3× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • CO
    CARES OF FARMINGTON HILLS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • TD
    THE DETROIT CATHOLIC PASTORAL ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue -26%
  • TA
    THE ALLIANCE FOR A SAFER GREATER DETROIT
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
2
Macomb Residential Opportunities Inc

To serve individuals with disabilities by providing residential and personal support in a manner that promotes individual dignity, community integration and quality of life

—
3
Say Detroit

Providing pathways to success for detroiters in need.

Housing & Shelter
4
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
5
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
6
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
7
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
8
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

—
10
Lighthouse of Oakland County

To support lighthouse mi in their mission to build equitable communities and alleviate poverty in partnership with and in service to individuals, families, and organizations.

Human Services
11
Arc Michigan

Arc michigan empowers local chapters to assure that citizens with disabilites and their families participate fully in and contribute to the life of their community.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Southeast Michigan Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Annes Mead. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
27/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN: $73,500 · OtherCROSSROADS OF MICHIGANST JOHN FISHER CHAPEL UNIVERSITY PARISH AUBURN HILLS: $40,000 · OtherST JOHN FISHER CHAPEL UNIVERSITY PARISH AUBURN HIL…THE FURNITURE RESOURCE CENTER: $34,500 · OtherTHE FURNITURE RESOURCE CENTERFAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS: $34,300 · OtherFAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ART…GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $28,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCHOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL: $26,000 · OtherOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCILVARIETY CLUB CHARITY FOR CHILDREN DBA VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY: $25,500 · OtherVARIETY CLUB CHARITY FOR CHILDREN DBA VARIETY THE …SEEDLINGS BRAILLE BOOKS FOR CHILDREN: $22,000 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $19,000 · OtherST ANNES MEAD: $16,000 · OtherRACQUET UP DETROIT: $27,450 · OtherRACQUET UP DETROITTHE DETROIT CATHOLIC PASTORAL ALLIANCE: $25,900 · OtherTHE DETROIT CATHOLIC PASTORAL ALLIANCE+9 more: $90,000 · Other+9 moreOPEN HANDS FOOD PANTRY: $47,000 · Human ServicesOPEN HANDS FOOD PANTRYLADIES OF CHARITY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OAKLAND COUNTY ASSOCIATION: $46,000 · Human ServicesLADIES OF CHARITY OF ST VIN…Community Assistance Program Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Assistance Progra…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $34,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHE…CAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $20,500 · Human ServicesCAMP CASEY CORPORATIONTEAM GUTS INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesTEAM GUTS INCTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF…+4 more: $26,400 · Human Services+4 morePINK FUND INC: $46,500 · HealthPINK FUND INCNEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT INC: $45,450 · HealthNEW HOPE CENTER…ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $23,300 · HealthON MY OWN OF MI…TROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE: $13,500 · HealthTROY COMMUNITY …GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE ALLIANCE: $5,000 · HealthTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $5,000 · HealthACCENT PONTIAC INC: $27,300 · EducationBOUND TOGETHER: $8,000 · EducationWOMEN WHO WELD: $8,000 · EducationMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT: $5,500 · EducationCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $15,500 · Crime & LegalTHE ALLIANCE FOR A SAFER GREATER DETROIT: $15,000 · Crime & LegalWELLSPRING: $11,000 · Crime & LegalFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - DETROIT: $6,500 · Crime & LegalREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC: $31,000 · Housing & ShelterBethany Presbyterian Manor: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH OAKLAND SHELTER: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCARES OF FARMINGTON HILLS INC: $35,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$462,150Human Services$251,400Health$138,750Education$48,800Crime & Legal$48,000Housing & Shelter$47,000Food & Nutrition$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN: $73,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetOPEN HANDS FOOD PANTRY: $47,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetPINK FUND INC: $46,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLADIES OF CHARITY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OAKLAND COUNTY ASSOCIATION: $46,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetNEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT INC: $45,450 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCommunity Assistance Program Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetCARES OF FARMINGTON HILLS INC: $35,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTHE FURNITURE RESOURCE CENTER: $34,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $34,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS: $34,300 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC: $31,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT: $27,450 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetACCENT PONTIAC INC: $27,300 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL: $26,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT CATHOLIC PASTORAL ALLIANCE: $25,900 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetVARIETY CLUB CHARITY FOR CHILDREN DBA VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY: $25,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $23,300 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSEEDLINGS BRAILLE BOOKS FOR CHILDREN: $22,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $20,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTEAM GUTS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST ANNES MEAD: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR A SAFER GREATER DETROIT: $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT: $14,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE: $13,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetBethany Presbyterian Manor: $11,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWELLSPRING: $11,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $8,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTROY NATURE SOCIETY: $8,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWOMEN WHO WELD: $8,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - DETROIT: $6,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDeveloping Kingdoms in Different Stages: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH OAKLAND SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way for Southe…Phillip and Elizabeth…DTE Energy FoundationCanton Community Foun…Young Woman's Home As…Detroit Industrial Sc…The Barton Malow Foun…The Skillman Foundati…Priority Health Total…The Carls FoundationHarry a and Margaret …
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI50.4× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · DTE Energy Foundation · Canton Community Foundation Inc · Young Woman's Home Association of Detroit Michigan · Detroit Industrial School · The Barton Malow Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Priority Health Total Health Foundation · The Carls Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Village Club Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Village Club Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Village Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home